From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5519DC47E48 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E565613C7 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237877AbhGOOuT (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:50:19 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:60522 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235310AbhGOOuS (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:50:18 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (96-65-121-81-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.65.121.81]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 16FEl3hj017299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:47:04 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id C6F574202F5; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:47:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:47:02 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Hugh Dickins , Linus Torvalds , Mike Kravetz , Miaohe Lin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM , stable Subject: Re: 5.13.2-rc and others have many not for stable Message-ID: References: <2b1b798e-8449-11e-e2a1-daf6a341409b@google.com> <20210713182813.2fdd57075a732c229f901140@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:01:04AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Because cc: stable came first, and for some reason people think that it > > is all that is necessary to get patches committed to the stable tree, > > despite it never being documented or that way. I have to correct > > someone about this about 2x a month on the stable@vger list. > > For a developer, it's much easier to not care about "Cc: stable" > at all, because as soon as you add a "Cc: stable" to a patch, or CC > stable, someone will compain ;-) Much easier to just add a Fixes: tag, > and know it will be backported to trees that have the "buggy" commit. What sort of complaints have you gotten? I add "cc: stable" for the ext4 tree, and I can't say I've gotten any complaints. - Ted