From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:49:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPbwmVk1YD9+y7tr@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnpl86sz.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Tuesday 20 Jul 2021 at 14:15:56 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 12:13:20 +0100,
> Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 15 Jul 2021 at 17:31:47 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > +struct s2_walk_data {
> > > + kvm_pte_t pteval;
> > > + u32 level;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int s2_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> > > + enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag, void * const arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct s2_walk_data *data = arg;
> > > +
> > > + data->level = level;
> > > + data->pteval = *ptep;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Assumes mmu_lock taken */
> > > +static bool __check_ioguard_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t ipa)
> > > +{
> > > + struct s2_walk_data data;
> > > + struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > > + .cb = s2_walker,
> > > + .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > > + .arg = &data,
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + kvm_pgtable_walk(vcpu->arch.hw_mmu->pgt, ALIGN_DOWN(ipa, PAGE_SIZE),
> > > + PAGE_SIZE, &walker);
> > > +
> > > + /* Must be a PAGE_SIZE mapping with our annotation */
> > > + return (BIT(ARM64_HW_PGTABLE_LEVEL_SHIFT(data.level)) == PAGE_SIZE &&
> > > + data.pteval == MMIO_NOTE);
> >
> > Nit: you could do this check in the walker directly and check the return
> > value of kvm_pgtable_walk() instead. That would allow to get rid of
> > struct s2_walk_data.
> >
> > Also, though the compiler might be able to optimize, maybe simplify the
> > level check to level == (KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1)?
>
> Yup, all good points. I guess I could do the same in my other series
> that parses the userspace PT to extract the level.
Well, actually, let me take that back. I think something like you have
would be useful, but in pgtable.c directly and re-usable for stage-1 and
stage-2 walks. Maybe something like the below (totally untested)?
I could use such a walker in several places as well in the memory
ownership series:
- following the idea of [1], I could remove the
kvm_pgtable_stage2_find_range() function entirely;
- [2] defines 2 custom walkers that do nothing but walk host stage-2
and hyp stage-1 page-tables to check permissions and such -- they
could be removed/re-implemented easily as well.
And you seem to need something similar here, so clearly there is a need.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Quentin
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20210719104735.3681732-3-qperret@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20210719104735.3681732-14-qperret@google.com/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index e0ae57dca827..bd6d26f27e1a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -357,6 +357,38 @@ int kvm_pgtable_walk(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
return _kvm_pgtable_walk(&walk_data);
}
+struct get_leaf_data {
+ kvm_pte_t *ptep;
+ u32 *level;
+};
+
+static int get_leaf_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
+ enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag, void * const arg)
+{
+ struct get_leaf_data *data = arg;
+
+ *(data->ptep) = *ptep;
+ *(data->level) = level;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_pgtable_get_leaf(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
+ u32 *level)
+{
+ struct get_leaf_data data = {
+ .ptep = ptep,
+ .level = level,
+ };
+ struct kvm_pgtable_walker __get_leaf_walker = {
+ .cb = get_leaf_walker,
+ .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
+ .arg = &data,
+ };
+
+ return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, PAGE_SIZE, &__get_leaf_walker);
+}
+
struct hyp_map_data {
u64 phys;
kvm_pte_t attr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 16:31 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: arm64: Generalise VM features into a set of flags Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 14:51 ` Steven Price
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 17:18 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 9:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:09 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:38 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:36 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:13 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 15:49 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2021-07-22 18:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 10:16 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:26 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:58 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Plumb MMIO checking into the fault handling Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:38 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: arm64: Force a full unmap on vpcu reinit Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:50 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: arm64: Wire MMIO guard hypercalls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-01 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoint for failed MMIO guard check Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Advertise a capability for MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add some documentation for the MMIO guard feature Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:17 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:38 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] firmware/smccc: Call arch-specific hook on discovering KVM services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 12/16] mm/ioremap: Add arch-specific callbacks on ioremap/iounmap calls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 11:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 14:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 13/16] arm64: Implement ioremap/iounmap hooks calling into KVM's MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 14/16] arm64: Enroll into KVM's MMIO guard if required Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 15/16] arm64: Add a helper to retrieve the PTE of a fixmap Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:16 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 16/16] arm64: Register earlycon fixmap with the MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:42 ` [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 10:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 13:25 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 15:30 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPbwmVk1YD9+y7tr@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vatsa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).