linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: accept userspace interrupt only if no event is injected
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:58:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQBzgtBXZ4SIz9jF@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727170620.1643969-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Once an exception has been injected, any side effects related to
> the exception (such as setting CR2 or DR6) have been taked place.
> Therefore, once KVM sets the VM-entry interruption information
> field or the AMD EVENTINJ field, the next VM-entry must deliver that
> exception.
> 
> Pending interrupts are processed after injected exceptions, so
> in theory it would not be a problem to use KVM_INTERRUPT when
> an injected exception is present.  However, DOSEMU is using
> run->ready_for_interrupt_injection to detect interrupt windows
> and then using KVM_SET_SREGS/KVM_SET_REGS to inject the
> interrupt manually.  For this to work, the interrupt window
> must be delayed after the completion of the previous event
> injection.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru>
> Tested-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru>
> Fixes: 71cc849b7093 ("KVM: x86: Fix split-irqchip vs interrupt injection window request")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> (cherry picked from commit 043264d97e9ab74cc9661c8b1f9c00c8ce24cad9)

?  I can't find 043264d97e9ab74cc9661c8b1f9c00c8ce24cad9 anywhere.

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4116567f3d44..5e921f1e00db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4358,8 +4358,18 @@ static int kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static int kvm_vcpu_ready_for_interrupt_injection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not cause an interrupt window exit if an exception
> +	 * is pending or an event needs reinjection; userspace
> +	 * might want to inject the interrupt manually using KVM_SET_REGS
> +	 * or KVM_SET_SREGS.  For that to work, we must be at an
> +	 * instruction boundary and with no events half-injected.
> +	 */
>  	return kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
> -		kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(vcpu);
> +		kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(vcpu) &&

Opportunistically align this indentation?

> +	        !kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu)

Missing &&, apparently the mysterious cherry-pick didn't go so well :-)

> +	        !vcpu->arch.exception.pending;
> +
>  }
>  
>  static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27 17:06 [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: accept userspace interrupt only if no event is injected Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-27 20:58 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-07-27 21:08   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YQBzgtBXZ4SIz9jF@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stsp2@yandex.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).