From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] perf jevents: Relocate test events to cpu folder
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:34:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRKOXJ9uskRyiLQK@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40e85ad2-3db4-aecf-d972-7d4aa5c2278c@huawei.com>
Em Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 03:23:07PM +0100, John Garry escreveu:
> On 10/08/2021 15:01, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Shall I send this as a formal patch?
> > The question is when should I apply this patch? After this series? After
> > the patch I commented about, before?
> >
>
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> I think that you can apply it before the series. This is a pre-existing
> issue that there was no dependency checking on the test events folder for
> rebuilding pmu-event.c .
Ok, will do so, thanks for clarifying.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 13:56 [PATCH 00/11] perf test: Improve pmu-events support John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf test: Factor out pmu-events event comparison John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf jevents: Relocate test events to cpu folder John Garry
2021-08-02 14:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-02 15:02 ` John Garry
2021-08-03 8:19 ` John Garry
2021-08-09 15:46 ` John Garry
2021-08-10 14:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-10 14:23 ` John Garry
2021-08-10 14:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-08-10 17:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-11 7:59 ` John Garry
2021-08-11 18:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf test: Declare pmu-events test events separately John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf test: Factor out pmu-events alias comparison John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf test: Test pmu-events core aliases separately John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf pmu: Check .is_uncore field in pmu_add_cpu_aliases_map() John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf test: Re-add pmu-event uncore PMU alias test John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf test: Add more pmu-events uncore aliases John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf pmu: Make pmu_add_sys_aliases() public John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf jevents: Print SoC name per system event table John Garry
2021-07-29 13:56 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf test: Add pmu-events sys event support John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRKOXJ9uskRyiLQK@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).