From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
swboyd@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
rnayak@codeaurora.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org,
msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com, skakit@codeaurora.org,
Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QSPI node
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:09:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRUdccjvf+ivbqor@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628754078-29779-2-git-send-email-rajpat@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:11:12PM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote:
> From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
>
> Add QSPI DT node and qspi_opp_table for SC7280 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 53a21d0..f8dd5ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -415,6 +415,25 @@
> method = "smc";
> };
>
> + qspi_opp_table: qspi-opp-table {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> + opp-75000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <75000000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-150000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <150000000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-300000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> + };
> + };
> +
From v3:
roja> Can we move this "qspi_opp_table" to / from /soc?
bjorn> If you have made a proper attempt to convince Rob and Mark that
bjorn> a child "opp-table" in a SPI master is not a SPI device - and the
bjorn> conclusion is that this is not a good idea...then yes it should live
bjorn> outside /soc.
I didn't see a follow up on this, was such an attempt made? Is there a
link to the discussion?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 7:41 [PATCH V5 0/7] Add QSPI and QUPv3 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 1/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QSPI node Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 13:09 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2021-08-26 12:59 ` rajpat
2021-09-03 15:46 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 2/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure SPI-NOR FLASH for sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 13:15 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-23 11:44 ` rajpat
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 3/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_0 nodes Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 14:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 16:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-26 13:07 ` rajpat
2021-08-26 19:51 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-09-01 7:06 ` rajpat
2021-08-19 0:04 ` Doug Anderson
2021-08-26 12:53 ` rajpat
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 4/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Update QUPv3 UART5 DT node Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 15:46 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 5/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure debug uart for sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 16:05 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-26 13:07 ` rajpat
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 6/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure uart7 to support bluetooth on sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 19:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 7/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 nodes Rajesh Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRUdccjvf+ivbqor@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rajpat@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rojay@codeaurora.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skakit@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).