From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B345C4338F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B8B610A5 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240035AbhHMKT6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:19:58 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:60591 "EHLO wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240027AbhHMKTH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:19:07 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9141A3200954; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:18:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:18:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=anzC8ZRMZSWdfChkQsS28eBhKJx SGQXXEm17xUZ0I3E=; b=xB2b3ycI0wM1n4F3ChcHdwCKPlVEEtNs6GBUpcQld33 lCmcw7aI7Kjloc1GrQiJWiHISQOzfF2JT/mfcSVTUBaBkfvwtH9E8Fb2Bgtkhdvi sCmnm9VuIGMvpL2xnBzOjFsd0HOD4mngrVyRXzNfKR+5wfSn29B7vZDNolWSixKx cbPTprIV7xsmKNxQsWhtlBUML5ZZ65xWtlN6ShOCxQt5jyokAGZovMoTYjc1k/OT 2/Z5Enh2O4bP2ojYkw3NWYHlevccL5UpuBtL0b0fxWr1vrd4HLneTpew37lIeFqV iXU7RfsOqfuz2S2/UakwlloI85fw0ZP4L6Pyy1r9LEA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=anzC8Z RMZSWdfChkQsS28eBhKJxSGQXXEm17xUZ0I3E=; b=JgLIbQwubmvXBaf+q79hmP v6dj2mgQsItPK5JkLPy1TVOFaic1O2o0CRd98SBzufvvkbgju+SFyvPnujdHW3PR evoFlKC/+ERcWVnq0pkMbXkVNVEFy1SfFyYKSPL4cAp3DWbYM4xa9AThV8ArFRak DU4U03PurZx9NS9ISEW/wBdmIlogGU8wLSdfZHGuYIwsjW+kXr47RpqJAu2fkCde sHphwp/NyoIqvsGR+CIv7u68ALfw2387DO/d4fkIwPf7sajr6SOn5al1aNxv69Fl qH5JIjtVDsD9qYYL0Qypbg771gW/PyVghs/ENqVx/VOWrXmc7qpD8tQrVLgfte/g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrkeehgddviecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfm jfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeuheejgf ffgfeivddukedvkedtleelleeghfeljeeiueeggeevueduudekvdetnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrd gtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:18:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:18:27 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Anand Jain Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] make btrfs/153 sucessful on 5.4.y Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:55:23PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Patch 1-2 and 5 helps to fix the conflicts smoothly. > Patch 3-4 and 6 fixes the regression as reported by the > test case btrfs/153 and comes from the below patch-set > (btrfs: qgroup: Fix the long-existing regression of btrfs/153) > Patch 7 fixes lockdep Warning as in the commit log now reported by > the test case btrfs/153 on 5.4.y All queued up, thanks! greg k-h