Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: irq-meson-gpio: make it possible to build as a module

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

On Thu, 05 Aug 2021, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Wed, 04 Aug 2021, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:20 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:50 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 02:36:45 +0100,
> > > > Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Saravana,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for looking into this.
> > >
> > > You are welcome. I just don't want people to think fw_devlink is broken :)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > > Saravana, could you please have a look from a fw_devlink perspective?
> > > > >
> > > > > Sigh... I spent several hours looking at this and wrote up an analysis
> > > > > and then realized I might be looking at the wrong DT files.
> > > > >
> > > > > Marc, can you point me to the board file in upstream that corresponds
> > > > > to the platform in which you see this issue? I'm not asking for [1],
> > > > > but the actual final .dts (not .dtsi) file that corresponds to the
> > > > > platform/board/system.
> > > >
> > > > The platform I can reproduce this on is described in
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-khadas-vim3l.dts. It is an
> > > > intricate maze of inclusion, node merge and other DT subtleties. I
> > > > suggest you look at the decompiled version to get a view of the
> > > > result.
> > >
> > > Thanks. After decompiling it, it looks something like (stripped a
> > > bunch of reg and address properties and added the labels back):
> > >
> > > eth_phy: mdio-multiplexer@4c000 {
> > >         compatible = "amlogic,g12a-mdio-mux";
> > >         clocks = <0x02 0x13 0x1e 0x02 0xb1>;
> > >         clock-names = "pclk\0clkin0\0clkin1";
> > >         mdio-parent-bus = <0x22>;
> > >
> > >         ext_mdio: mdio@0 {
> > >                 reg = <0x00>;
> > >
> > >                 ethernet-phy@0 {
> > >                         max-speed = <0x3e8>;
> > >                         interrupt-parent = <0x23>;
> > >                         interrupts = <0x1a 0x08>;
> > >                         phandle = <0x16>;
> > >                 };
> > >         };
> > >
> > >         int_mdio: mdio@1 {
> > >                 ...
> > >         }
> > > }
> > >
> > > And phandle 0x23 refers to the gpio_intc interrupt controller with the
> > > modular driver.
> > >
> > > > > Based on your error messages, it's failing for mdio@0 which
> > > > > corresponds to ext_mdio. But none of the board dts files in upstream
> > > > > have a compatible property for "ext_mdio". Which means fw_devlink
> > > > > _should_ propagate the gpio_intc IRQ dependency all the way up to
> > > > > eth_phy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, in the failing case, can you run:
> > > > > ls -ld supplier:*
> > > > >
> > > > > in the /sys/devices/....<something>/ folder that corresponds to the
> > > > > "eth_phy: mdio-multiplexer@4c000" DT node and tell me what it shows?
> > > >
> > > > Here you go:
> > > >
> > > > root@tiger-roach:~# find /sys/devices/ -name 'supplier*'|grep -i mdio | xargs ls -ld
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Aug  4 09:47 /sys/devices/platform/soc/ff600000.bus/ff64c000.mdio-multiplexer/supplier:platform:ff63c000.system-controller:clock-controller -> ../../../../virtual/devlink/platform:ff63c000.system-controller:clock-controller--platform:ff64c000.mdio-multiplexer
> > >
> > > As we discussed over chat, this was taken after the mdio-multiplexer
> > > driver "successfully" probes this device. This will cause
> > > SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links created by fw_devlink to be deleted
> > > (because they are useless after a device probes). So, this doesn't
> > > show the info I was hoping to demonstrate.
> > >
> > > In any case, one can see that fw_devlink properly created the device
> > > link for the clocks dependency. So fw_devlink is parsing this node
> > > properly. But it doesn't create a similar probe order enforcing device
> > > link between the mdio-multiplexer and the gpio_intc because the
> > > dependency is only present in a grand child DT node (ethernet-phy@0
> > > under ext_mdio). So fw_devlink is working as intended.
> > >
> > > I spent several hours squinting at the code/DT yesterday. Here's what
> > > is going on and causing the problem:
> > >
> > > The failing driver in this case is
> > > drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-meson-g12a.c. And the only DT node it's
> > > handling is what I pasted above in this email. In the failure case,
> > > the call flow is something like this:
> > >
> > > g12a_mdio_mux_probe()
> > > -> mdio_mux_init()
> > > -> of_mdiobus_register(ext_mdio DT node)
> > > -> of_mdiobus_register_phy(ext_mdio DT node)
> > > -> several calls deep fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register(ethernet_phy DT node)
> > > -> Tried to get the IRQ listed in ethernet_phy and fails with
> > > -EPROBE_DEFER because the IRQ driver isn't loaded yet.
> > >
> > > The error is propagated correctly all the way up to of_mdiobus_register(), but
> > > mdio_mux_init() ignores the -EPROBE_DEFER from of_mdiobus_register() and just
> > > continues on with the rest of the stuff and returns success as long as
> > > one of the child nodes (in this case int_mdio) succeeds.
> > >
> > > Since the probe returns 0 without really succeeding, networking stuff
> > > just fails badly after this. So, IMO, the real problem is with
> > > mdio_mux_init() not propagating up the -EPROBE_DEFER. I gave Marc a
> > > quick hack (pasted at the end of this email) to test my theory and he
> > > confirmed that it fixes the issue (a few deferred probes later, things
> > > work properly).
> > >
> > > Andrew, I don't see any good reason for mdio_mux_init() not
> > > propagating the errors up correctly (at least for EPROBE_DEFER). I'll
> > > send a patch to fix this. Please let me know if there's a reason it
> > > has to stay as-is.
> > 
> > I sent out the proper fix as a series:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210804214333.927985-1-saravanak@google.com/T/#t
> > 
> > Marc, can you give it a shot please?
> > 
> > -Saravana
> 
> Superstar!  Thanks for taking the time to rectify this for all of us.

Just to clarify:

  Are we waiting on a subsequent patch submission at this point?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog