From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/16] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:53:28 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YRz0uI6V58eGNL1C@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YRznaZBHXYEzCPt1@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:56:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:42:28AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > I think the idea looks good, but perhaps we could wrap things up a bit: > > > > /* Comment about why this is useful with RT */ > > static cpumask_t *clear_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > struct cpumask *user_mask = NULL; > > > > swap(user_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr); > > return user_mask; > > } > > > > void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > kfree(clear_user_cpus_ptr(p)); > > } > > > > Then just use clear_user_cpus_ptr() in sched/core.c where we know what > > we're doing (well, at least one of us does!). > > OK, I'll go make it like that. Something like so then? --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2497,10 +2497,18 @@ int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct return 0; } +static inline struct cpumask *clear_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) +{ + struct cpumask *user_mask = NULL; + + swap(p->user_cpus_ptr, user_mask); + + return user_mask; +} + void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) { - kfree(p->user_cpus_ptr); - p->user_cpus_ptr = NULL; + kfree(clear_user_cpus_ptr(p)); } /* @@ -2733,6 +2741,7 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked const struct cpumask *cpu_allowed_mask = task_cpu_possible_mask(p); const struct cpumask *cpu_valid_mask = cpu_active_mask; bool kthread = p->flags & PF_KTHREAD; + struct cpumask *user_mask = NULL; unsigned int dest_cpu; int ret = 0; @@ -2792,9 +2801,13 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked __do_set_cpus_allowed(p, new_mask, flags); if (flags & SCA_USER) - release_user_cpus_ptr(p); + user_mask = clear_user_cpus_ptr(p); - return affine_move_task(rq, p, rf, dest_cpu, flags); + ret = affine_move_task(rq, p, rf, dest_cpu, flags); + + kfree(user_mask); + + return ret; out: task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf); @@ -2941,20 +2954,22 @@ __sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct * */ void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p) { + struct cpumask *user_mask = p->user_cpus_ptr; unsigned long flags; - struct cpumask *mask = p->user_cpus_ptr; /* * Try to restore the old affinity mask. If this fails, then * we free the mask explicitly to avoid it being inherited across * a subsequent fork(). */ - if (!mask || !__sched_setaffinity(p, mask)) + if (!user_mask || !__sched_setaffinity(p, user_mask)) return; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); - release_user_cpus_ptr(p); + user_mask = clear_user_cpus_ptr(p); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); + + kfree(user_mask); } void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-18 11:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-30 11:24 [PATCH v11 00/16] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 01/16] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 02/16] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 03/16] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 04/16] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 05/16] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 06/16] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 07/16] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon 2021-08-17 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-08-18 10:50 ` Will Deacon 2021-08-18 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-08-18 11:11 ` Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 08/16] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon 2021-08-17 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-08-18 10:42 ` Will Deacon 2021-08-18 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-08-18 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2021-08-18 12:19 ` Will Deacon 2021-08-18 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-08-17 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-08-18 10:43 ` Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 09/16] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon 2021-08-23 9:26 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 10/16] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 11/16] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 12/16] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 13/16] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 14/16] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 15/16] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon 2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 16/16] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YRz0uI6V58eGNL1C@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=bristot@redhat.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=surenb@google.com \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v11 08/16] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).