From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687CFC432BE for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2366056B for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234029AbhH3Hdy (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 03:33:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36618 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232321AbhH3Hdx (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 03:33:53 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FFBC061575; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 00:32:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=CsUY/25ldc/6yahhooVuAywYxR4PUqEW9297uxOOCDU=; b=NcP4iF5tJ9VEvyLqe7IMu72O+V I3qr7DNGae5hgE7ncyEKZ/b1464fzo8K97qrKFweFipsAWDDe4ort38XqiYLHu23IPSi/+ozsftoV Mey+aSOuwJBBH9RhEQ8ALrDoYyl2KJlQQC4pFs0RvXdGlsll8GF9WHSO4sY+Ynwh0hrzm4LeEKC1m XZSABurZOxkd/4UD4vruvdg0OcvYk47NN2Ksar/znHeairQJoalg4v0osoxgPMZ/9iDFb9SSrtCdg WIhB2PUbk/k9db0/QbIuv8XmCLSLUTr1l/D+y5qWhHC5l8U2DSYEw6cL4XYbbXKVFq9TGH9NXTuhu 5zrRLB9g==; Received: from hch by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mKbm1-00HSK5-13; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 07:32:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:32:05 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Li Zhijian Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jglisse@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, hch@infradead.org, yishaih@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hmm: bypass devmap pte when all pfn requested flags are fulfilled Message-ID: References: <20210828010441.3702-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210828010441.3702-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:04:41AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: > + if (!pte_devmap(pte) && pte_special(pte) && > + !is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pte))) { Maybe this is a little too superficial and nitpicky, but I find the ordering of the checks a little strange. Why not do the pte_special first and then the exlusions from it later?