linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] serial: 8250: Implement prep_tx for power management
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 18:16:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YU3ruj32L/iaZS1h@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YU3kPHg2qLr//HEF@hovoldconsulting.com>

* Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> [210924 14:44]:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 06:05:36PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> [210923 12:50]:
> > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 01:33:44PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > +static int serial8250_prep_tx(struct uart_port *port)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct uart_8250_port *up = up_to_u8250p(port);
> > > > +	struct device *dev = up->port.dev;
> > > > +	int err;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!(up->capabilities & UART_CAP_RPM))
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
> > > > +		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	err = pm_request_resume(dev);
> > > > +	if (err < 0) {
> > > > +		dev_warn(dev, "prep_tx wakeup failed: %d\n", err);
> > > > +		return err;
> > > > +	}
> > > 
> > > How is this supposed to work without a runtime PM usage-counter
> > > increment? What's to prevent the port from suspending again while it's
> > > transmitting?
> > 
> > Hmm yeah we should at pm_runtime_get() and pm_runtime_put() to write()
> > unless serial8250_rpm_get() and serial8250_rpm_put() are doing it.
> 
> If you do the put after just buffering the data it doesn't really solve
> anything.

Right, sounds like we currently rely on the autosuspend_timeout
there.

> > Or pair prep with finish and deal with the usage count there.
> 
> Problem is where to call it from. How do you tell the device is done
> transmitting? And how should we deal with flow control? Etc.

Maybe if the device driver needs to call uart_start() also from runtime
PM idle function and if no data allow suspend. Then if there is
more data, uart_write() calls uart_start() again, device wakes up
and so on.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21 10:33 [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of pm_runtime_irq_safe() for 8250_omap Tony Lindgren
2021-09-21 10:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] n_tty: Start making use of -EAGAIN returned from process_output_block() Tony Lindgren
2021-09-21 11:58   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-21 10:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] tty: n_gsm: Don't ignore write return value in gsmld_output() Tony Lindgren
2021-09-21 10:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] serial: core: Add new prep_tx for power management Tony Lindgren
2021-09-23 12:45   ` Johan Hovold
2021-09-23 15:02     ` Tony Lindgren
2021-09-24 14:37       ` Johan Hovold
2021-09-24 15:09         ` Tony Lindgren
2021-09-27 14:05           ` Johan Hovold
2021-09-21 10:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] serial: 8250: Implement " Tony Lindgren
2021-09-23 12:49   ` Johan Hovold
2021-09-23 15:05     ` Tony Lindgren
2021-09-24 14:44       ` Johan Hovold
2021-09-24 15:16         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2021-09-21 10:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] serial: 8250_omap: Require a valid wakeirq for deeper idle states Tony Lindgren
2021-09-21 10:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] serial: 8250_omap: Drop the use of pm_runtime_irq_safe() Tony Lindgren
2021-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of pm_runtime_irq_safe() for 8250_omap Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YU3ruj32L/iaZS1h@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).