linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" 
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" 
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: fix panic by mark recursion inside perf_log_throttle
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:28:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUB5VchM3a/MiZpX@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fb7c51f-696b-da70-1965-1dda9910cb14@linux.alibaba.com>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:58:44AM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
> On 2021/9/13 下午6:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > I'm confused tho; where does the #DF come from? Because taking a #PF
> > from NMI should be perfectly fine.
> > 
> > AFAICT that callchain is something like:
> > 
> > 	NMI
> > 	  perf_event_nmi_handler()
> > 	    (part of the chain is missing here)
> > 	      perf_log_throttle()
> > 	        perf_output_begin() /* events/ring_buffer.c */
> > 		  rcu_read_lock()
> > 		    rcu_lock_acquire()
> > 		      lock_acquire()
> > 		        trace_lock_acquire() --> perf_trace_foo
> > 
> > 			  ...
> > 			    perf_callchain()
> > 			      perf_callchain_user()
> > 			        #PF (fully expected during a userspace callchain)
> > 				  (some stuff, until the first __fentry)
> > 				    perf_trace_function_call
> > 				      perf_trace_buf_alloc()
> > 				        perf_swevent_get_recursion_context()
> > 					  *BOOM*
> > 
> > Now, supposedly we then take another #PF from get_recursion_context() or
> > something, but that doesn't make sense. That should just work...
> > 
> > Can you figure out what's going wrong there? going with the RIP, this
> > almost looks like 'swhash->recursion' goes splat, but again that makes
> > no sense, that's a per-cpu variable.
> 
> That's true, I actually have tried several approach to avoid the issue, but
> it trigger panic as long as we access 'swhash->recursion', the array should
> be accessible but somehow broken, that's why I consider this a suspected
> stack overflow, since nmi repeated and trace seems very long, but just a
> suspect...

You can simply increase the exception stack size to test this:

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
index a8d4ad856568..e9e2c3ba5923 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 #define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER	(2 + KASAN_STACK_ORDER)
 #define THREAD_SIZE  (PAGE_SIZE << THREAD_SIZE_ORDER)
 
-#define EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER (0 + KASAN_STACK_ORDER)
+#define EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER (1 + KASAN_STACK_ORDER)
 #define EXCEPTION_STKSZ (PAGE_SIZE << EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER)
 
 #define IRQ_STACK_ORDER (2 + KASAN_STACK_ORDER)



Also, something like this might be useful:


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index f248eb2ac2d4..4dfdbb9395eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ bool in_task_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
 
 bool in_entry_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info);
 
+bool in_exception_stack_guard(unsigned long *stack);
+
 int get_stack_info(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
 		   struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask);
 bool get_stack_info_noinstr(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 5601b95944fa..056cf4f31599 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -126,6 +126,39 @@ static __always_inline bool in_exception_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stac
 	return true;
 }
 
+noinstr bool in_exception_stack_guard(unsigned long *stack)
+{
+	unsigned long begin, end, stk = (unsigned long)stack;
+	const struct estack_pages *ep;
+	unsigned int k;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(N_EXCEPTION_STACKS != 6);
+
+	begin = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
+	/*
+	 * Handle the case where stack trace is collected _before_
+	 * cea_exception_stacks had been initialized.
+	 */
+	if (!begin)
+		return false;
+
+	end = begin + sizeof(struct cea_exception_stacks);
+	/* Bail if @stack is outside the exception stack area. */
+	if (stk < begin || stk >= end)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Calc page offset from start of exception stacks */
+	k = (stk - begin) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	/* Lookup the page descriptor */
+	ep = &estack_pages[k];
+	/* Guard page? */
+	if (!ep->size)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+
 static __always_inline bool in_irq_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
 {
 	unsigned long *end = (unsigned long *)this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_ptr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index a58800973aed..8b043ed02c0d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_DF(exc_double_fault)
 		handle_stack_overflow("kernel stack overflow (double-fault)",
 				      regs, address);
 	}
+
+	if (in_exception_stack_guard((void *)address))
+		pr_emerg("PANIC: exception stack guard: 0x%lx\n", address);
 #endif
 
 	pr_emerg("PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x%lx\n", error_code);

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-09  3:13 [RFC PATCH] perf: fix panic by mark recursion inside perf_log_throttle 王贇
2021-09-09  6:10 ` 王贇
2021-09-10 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-13  3:00   ` 王贇
2021-09-13  3:21     ` 王贇
2021-09-13 10:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-13 10:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-14  2:02         ` 王贇
2021-09-14  1:58       ` 王贇
2021-09-14 10:28         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-15  1:51           ` 王贇
2021-09-15 15:17             ` [PATCH] x86/dumpstack/64: Add guard pages to stack_info Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-16  3:34               ` 王贇
2021-09-16  3:47               ` 王贇
2021-09-16  8:00                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-16  8:03                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-16 10:02                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-17  2:15                       ` 王贇
2021-09-17  3:02                       ` 王贇
2021-09-17 10:21                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-17 16:40                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-18  2:30                             ` 王贇
2021-09-18  6:56                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-18  2:38                             ` 王贇
2021-09-13  3:30 ` [PATCH] perf: fix panic by disable ftrace on fault.c 王贇
2021-09-13 14:49   ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-14  1:52     ` 王贇
2021-09-14  3:02       ` 王贇
2021-09-14  7:23         ` 王贇
2021-09-14 16:16           ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-15  1:56             ` 王贇
2021-09-15  3:27               ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-15  7:22                 ` 王贇
2021-09-15  7:34                   ` 王贇
2021-09-15 15:19                     ` [PATCH] x86: Increase exception stack sizes Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-16  3:42                       ` 王贇
2021-09-21  7:28                       ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-21 12:41                       ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-14  2:08     ` [PATCH] perf: fix panic by disable ftrace on fault.c 王贇

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YUB5VchM3a/MiZpX@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).