linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>, Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>,
	kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Sandeep Dasgupta <sdasgup@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/13] Don't compute events that won't be used in a metric.
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:51:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVSZi3PhwsNl3LdE@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fXcq6Npio0n9y8znknNUGJ4ovtbi=hHr4jWG6H38=BzSA@mail.gmail.com>

Em Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:09:24AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:16 AM John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 23/09/2021 08:46, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > For a metric like:
> > >    EVENT1 if #smt_on else EVENT2
> > >
> > > currently EVENT1 and EVENT2 will be measured and then when the metric
> > > is reported EVENT1 or EVENT2 will be printed depending on the value
> > > from smt_on() during the expr parsing. Computing both events is
> > > unnecessary and can lead to multiplexing as discussed in this thread:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201110100346.2527031-1-irogers@google.com/
> > >
> > > This change modifies expression parsing so that constants are
> > > considered when building the set of ids (events) and only events not
> > > contributing to a constant value are measured.
> >
> > Based on some testing on my arm64 platform, no regression seen, so:
> >
> > Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> 
> Awesome, much thanks Jiri, John, Andi for the reviews and testing!

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo


      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-29 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23  7:46 [PATCH v9 00/13] Don't compute events that won't be used in a metric Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 01/13] perf metric: Restructure struct expr_parse_ctx Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] perf metric: Use NAN for missing event IDs Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] perf expr: Remove unused headers and inline d_ratio Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] perf expr: Separate token declataion from type Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] perf expr: Use macros for operators Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] perf expr: Move actions to the left Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] perf metric: Rename expr__find_other Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] perf metric: Add utilities to work on ids map Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] perf metric: Allow metrics with no events Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] perf expr: Merge find_ids and regular parsing Ian Rogers
2021-09-28 20:56   ` Jiri Olsa
2021-09-28 21:20     ` Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] perf expr: Propagate constants for binary operations Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] perf metric: Don't compute unused events Ian Rogers
2021-09-23  7:46 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] perf metric: Avoid events for an 'if' constant result Ian Rogers
2021-09-29  5:35 ` [PATCH v9 00/13] Don't compute events that won't be used in a metric Jiri Olsa
2021-09-29 15:19 ` John Garry
2021-09-29 16:09   ` Ian Rogers
2021-09-29 16:51     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVSZi3PhwsNl3LdE@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sdasgup@google.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).