Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: ia32.h: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION

[Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>]

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:35:31PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> The content of the ia32 header is guarded by
> "ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION". The comment on the corresponding endif
> refers slightly mismatching to CONFIG_IA32_SUPPORT instead.
> 
> Hence, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py warns:
> 
> IA32_SUPPORT
> Referencing files: arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h
> 
> Adjust the comment on endif to the actual ifdef condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Merged the last 4 into a single patch because they're trivial:

---
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 21:48:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Fix misspelled Kconfig symbols

Fix misspelled Kconfig symbols as detected by
scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py.

 [ bp: Combine into a single patch. ]

Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210803113531.30720-7-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h      | 2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h | 2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h   | 2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h   | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h
index 2c5f7861d373..fada857f0a1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h
@@ -68,6 +68,6 @@ extern void ia32_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm);
 
 #endif
 
-#endif /* !CONFIG_IA32_SUPPORT */
+#endif /* CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION */
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_IA32_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
index 562854c60808..8912492a78f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
  *     the output constraints to make the compiler aware that R11 cannot be
  *     reused after the asm() statement.
  *
- *     For builds with CONFIG_UNWIND_FRAME_POINTER ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT is
+ *     For builds with CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER, ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT is
  *     required as well as this prevents certain creative GCC variants from
  *     misplacing the ASM code.
  *
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h
index 94dbd51df58f..b13f8488ac85 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline void copy_page(void *to, void *from)
 {
 	memcpy(to, from, PAGE_SIZE);
 }
-#endif	/* CONFIG_X86_3DNOW */
+#endif	/* CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW */
 #endif	/* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_PAGE_32_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c9fa7be3df82..e7fc2c515e08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ do {									\
 		     : [umem] "m" (__m(addr)),				\
 		       [efault] "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
 
-#endif // CONFIG_CC_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT
+#endif // CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT
 
 /* FIXME: this hack is definitely wrong -AK */
 struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; };
-- 
2.29.2

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette