From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
ndesaulniers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86/alternative: Implement .retpoline_sites support
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:25:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW/SkCW9wSnFiivN@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019164913.2dsyyethdeblqjlq@treble>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:49:13AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> @@ -1916,8 +1930,25 @@ static int read_static_call_tramps(struct objtool_file *file)
> list_for_each_entry(func, &sec->symbol_list, list) {
> if (func->bind == STB_GLOBAL &&
> !strncmp(func->name, STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_PREFIX_STR,
> - strlen(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_PREFIX_STR)))
> + strlen(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_PREFIX_STR))) {
> func->static_call_tramp = true;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int read_retpoline_thunks(struct objtool_file *file)
> +{
> + struct section *sec;
> + struct symbol *func;
> +
> + for_each_sec(file, sec) {
> + list_for_each_entry(func, &sec->symbol_list, list) {
> + if (func->bind == STB_GLOBAL && arch_is_retpoline(func)) {
> + func->retpoline = true;
> + }
> }
> }
I've folded these two identical loops over all symbols into a single
classify_symbols() function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 12:22 [PATCH 0/9] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/9] objtool,x86: Replace alternatives with .retpoline_sites Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 20:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-14 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/retpoline: Remove unused replacement symbols Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/asm: Fix register order Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 20:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/alternative: Implement .retpoline_sites support Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 14:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-13 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 17:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-14 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 20:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 21:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 22:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-13 20:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 16:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-19 16:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-20 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-10-20 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 21:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 22:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 22:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-15 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-15 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-18 23:06 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 0:25 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 9:47 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 15:37 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-10-19 18:00 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/alternative: Handle Jcc __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 20:11 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-13 21:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/alternative: Try inline spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/alternative: Add debug prints to apply_retpolines() Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86,bugs: Unconditionally allow spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] bpf,x86: Respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE* Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 21:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-20 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YW/SkCW9wSnFiivN@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).