From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B099CC433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9503E60F3A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231872AbhJKHH7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:07:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54500 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230102AbhJKHH5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:07:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E6DC061570 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:05:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id r18so52814189wrg.6 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:05:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wMNVOKH7I9nZJBmdmY82PpMuTIJnDPrxHG2zjEA5m9s=; b=pzSf3o5Llbrkbhs9yWVdcshQQe7s/EdjJ3wKU95Bwif3mVaeFGYa+EUBkmmBXYW03d DQrx0IEd6u+eYTF2YWHoL5pOUwgorBAP4CKBsOzj44HhL+zXdM2NB+Coh8cr8D/jON43 OVCBCDKtMhQ1bWVbbSuOOzrQaLrwM8irwfgxmjgitZRbNQFf7x3CunUxuu3P0G3C50u7 Cfr4417v1OZiiH1fXWemiB760QnXpOshNsShWDsTP4CxIloYsyoK7/xS6qR/Dx3wMq9/ s8jnuo/KX33cv0vLJyZ9EpkpWlow2W6jwQ/Sirbmjn2IdAOpBih6kOcJW9svajFzl5bC vqlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wMNVOKH7I9nZJBmdmY82PpMuTIJnDPrxHG2zjEA5m9s=; b=2ryXBdZHxgtjEXG1/TZ7NhTg8qNuqLaLYjso1MscL+bHOAHnTsACMracunkWbIAq1F fXWRqbPcRVbMtU2oy5EsZ8NiupJSUG4b+MR03H0lEglNKKf3f9j9XjrhjNcJ/x4Vqvv0 L8qkYxUN5F0fMIqwURcXvJSfAriQ4Mo10T97cNZM4sZ/7NyxNcFqxEpaIXkneD+dOxab qHGbTt9cxuGZpmAsniER91sDdc9CE646vBHMkZjuZX+5k4RcQO8F2+ORb49ydqsEjF2x tzu7wv97p9uJdWnkhK1w1PHe8Pj7YvvLp522r7bh2/F5egUQLXRlz7AkubmPRwexgJcK VbTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530q9+ehVY8rhh5KKu1di5X8sRb+RO0E8OVa4WqAgtD5ey951dnW EtJ8+l7JPWt0OahnWtqzYGX3sfuFnPh/bA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKBXc4gUSq/yC+ip4ByIKGOGVWV28ONE7yJ0I9k61i/DnvMnUlb1J+JeJXSVO7uRqSmUCoxA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ae1a:: with SMTP id x26mr21985872wrc.30.1633935956529; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eldamar (80-218-24-251.dclient.hispeed.ch. [80.218.24.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm7171049wrg.57.2021.10.11.00.05.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Salvatore Bonaccorso Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:05:55 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: Lyude Paul Cc: Jeremy Cline , Ben Skeggs , Karol Herbst , David Airlie , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose() Message-ID: References: <20201103194912.184413-1-jcline@redhat.com> <20201125202648.5220-1-jcline@redhat.com> <418fdcbcf554d34cc6423a88974f916b64b3664c.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <418fdcbcf554d34cc6423a88974f916b64b3664c.camel@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we > currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future. > > Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this? > > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > This patch series is: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul > > > > > > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you > > > need > > > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous > > > one > > > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise > > > patchwork > > > won't pick it up > > > > Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost? Looking some older threads, noticed this one. Ben did you got a chance to look at it, or is it now irrelevant by other means? Regards, Salvatore