From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDBFC433EF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2FD60E09 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239312AbhJMKbu (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 06:31:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50248 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239036AbhJMKbt (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 06:31:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86E5C061570; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id o20so6695263wro.3; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:29:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hSQquE92GDIuuMjM8ONsdIor4uJxoCxMYcxZ2sqF8q4=; b=UQAuEDBMIoT6kzbdTnB/fM1CLB7BXXJz5uZV0VM8Bg4RKlMPdSIDcZz8VqwP/8/fLa B/MlmhNYGstOL4WTkrqJNACagDNc+URX0stJSpzuBuBDyFvcPWjRsUFXDy5kcbxNWwB+ VqEbAO+0AyeVN+jcSv5n29dBp7/p152qB+yPnYGULnw1CDlGqCKm8Qtd4nJC5tassKLK dugjuE4Otc4D07YlTi7UrYSeieKwJPHaHcxM+jgvJ42pXLcjqWAf5CgO2KykZ7kErmNa 2XSl6HP4DidsUgf8p8i6bowy7RygE/feJ8amKl+BaLDNNlnz/QrkMo6wSm4HiwTSbv/y vuTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hSQquE92GDIuuMjM8ONsdIor4uJxoCxMYcxZ2sqF8q4=; b=a9SZ/PPztCAGqyhFB2VeHP5GDthDsEnCPD1Kju0xbxLgp9fTNoyRzT0S5UKujuGY8S 6JDa2IlA5RVs6dpaDwt5j2k1+Q4VwCa02U5wlbmtY+OlvukDhS8la/e6hxdQYl0kiAGo /1JlmGoPQnRjqgkn3vEGf7wuySC+nWEe33P0HYfdKbnYC6yWRhVG6zmKu2o0rhpOjxoC ySsEaGYVTxVscOJHeisRs5bfzgkxut0dGP9dnXcKisPCBB9S9b9xU3GxcTZ8TyyYiiPK Ak/uX1uOLdos2LtAPYDrtT3j+I1jCxQYCd8Wkb0/IzlPRhZVwl09PqogPEqDvmxTYOox P1KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kW8vwooR5RyD50ct8uT2uekV+bfZgVktU1IwBfoeHTrUV61HH /MUQ0WEGkIxA3XtPgELNu6E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1HlDJSRWXvnkLDu8qeckp6tcf3and983LajrUGkC1CoaeqlQY7BxhLjxgqse8LR7C0ZfI9A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6c69:: with SMTP id r9mr38195357wrz.280.1634120984469; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g144sm5082913wmg.5.2021.10.13.03.29.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:29:42 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/51] 5.4.153-rc3 review Message-ID: References: <20211012093344.002301190@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211012093344.002301190@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:37:04AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.153 release. > There are 51 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/255 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip