From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F465C433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6572A610A2 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231709AbhJUMjz (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:39:55 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:46996 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231704AbhJUMjt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:39:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738A080FC; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:37:30 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Amit Pundir Cc: Saravana Kannan , Russell King , Neil Armstrong , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Damien Le Moal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ulf Hansson , Rob Herring , Android Kernel Team , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lkml , linux-oxnas@groups.io, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Baryshkov , John Stultz Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers: bus: Delete CONFIG_SIMPLE_PM_BUS Message-ID: References: <20210929000735.585237-1-saravanak@google.com> <20210929000735.585237-3-saravanak@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Amit Pundir [211021 11:22]: > Hi Saravana, > > This patch broke v5.15-rc6 on RB5 (sm8250 | qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts). > I can't boot past this point https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/raw/Nv6ZwHmW. Also, I noticed we now end up with simple-pm-bus.c that does no PM for the legacy which was the whole idea of the driver in the first place :) Saravana, could you consider just adding a new simple-bus.c driver in addition to simple-pm-bus.c for the cases that do not call pm_runtime_enable()? Thanks, Tony