linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, michael@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, namhyung@kernel.org, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
	atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:07:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXad+y2VCyC6y+CE@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211016125059.691856-1-maddy@linux.ibm.com>

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 06:20:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> branch_stack struct has bit field definition which
> produces different bit ordering for big/little endian.
> Because of this, when branch_stack sample is collected
> in a BE system and viewed/reported in a LE system, bit
> fields of the branch stack are not presented properly.
> To address this issue, a evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_stack()
> is defined and introduced in evsel__parse_sample.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>

for both patches

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

thanks,
jirka

> ---
> Changelog v1:
> - Renamed function and macro
> - Added comments in code
> 
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 13 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index dbfeceb2546c..746e642d4d32 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -2221,6 +2221,51 @@ void __weak arch_perf_parse_sample_weight(struct perf_sample *data,
>  	data->weight = *array;
>  }
>  
> +u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value)
> +{
> +	u64 new_val = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * branch_flags
> +	 * union {
> +	 * 	u64 values;
> +	 * 	struct {
> +	 * 		mispred:1	//target mispredicted
> +	 * 		predicted:1	//target predicted
> +	 * 		in_tx:1		//in transaction
> +	 * 		abort:1		//transaction abort
> +	 * 		cycles:16	//cycle count to last branch
> +	 * 		type:4		//branch type
> +	 * 		reserved:40
> +	 * 	}
> +	 * }
> +	 *
> +	 * Avoid bswap64() the entire branch_flag.value,
> +	 * as it has variable bit-field sizes. Instead the
> +	 * macro takes the bit-field position/size,
> +	 * swaps it based on the host endianness.
> +	 */
> +	if (bigendian()) {
> +		new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 0, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 1, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 2, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 3, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 4, 16);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 20, 4);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 24, 40);
> +	} else {
> +		new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 63, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 62, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 61, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 60, 1);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 44, 16);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 40, 4);
> +		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 0, 40);
> +	}
> +
> +	return new_val;
> +}
> +
>  int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
>  			struct perf_sample *data)
>  {
> @@ -2408,6 +2453,8 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
>  	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
>  		const u64 max_branch_nr = UINT64_MAX /
>  					  sizeof(struct branch_entry);
> +		struct branch_entry *e;
> +		unsigned int i;
>  
>  		OVERFLOW_CHECK_u64(array);
>  		data->branch_stack = (struct branch_stack *)array++;
> @@ -2416,10 +2463,33 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  
>  		sz = data->branch_stack->nr * sizeof(struct branch_entry);
> -		if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel))
> +		if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel)) {
>  			sz += sizeof(u64);
> -		else
> +			e = &data->branch_stack->entries[0];
> +		} else {
>  			data->no_hw_idx = true;
> +			/*
> +			 * if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied,
> +			 * only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel.
> +			 */
> +			e = (struct branch_entry *)&data->branch_stack->hw_idx;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (swapped) {
> +			/*
> +			 * struct branch_flag does not have endian
> +			 * specific bit field definition. And bswap
> +			 * will not resolve the issue, since these
> +			 * are bit fields.
> +			 *
> +			 * evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags() uses a
> +			 * bitfield_swap macro to swap the bit position
> +			 * based on the host endians.
> +			 */
> +			for (i = 0; i < data->branch_stack->nr; i++, e++)
> +				e->flags.value = evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(e->flags.value);
> +		}
> +
>  		OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
>  		array = (void *)array + sz;
>  	}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 1f7edfa8568a..2e82cdbe2c08 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -482,4 +482,17 @@ struct evsel *evsel__leader(struct evsel *evsel);
>  bool evsel__has_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader);
>  bool evsel__is_leader(struct evsel *evsel);
>  void evsel__set_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader);
> +
> +/*
> + * Macro to swap the bit-field postition and size.
> + * Used when,
> + * - dont need to swap the entire u64 &&
> + * - when u64 has variable bit-field sizes &&
> + * - when presented in a host endian which is different
> + *   than the source endian of the perf.data file
> + */
> +#define bitfield_swap(src, pos, size)	\
> +	((((src) >> (pos)) & ((1ull << (size)) - 1)) << (63 - ((pos) + (size) - 1)))
> +
> +u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value);
>  #endif /* __PERF_EVSEL_H */
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-25 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-16 12:50 [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-16 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tools/perf/test: Add endian test for struct branch_flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-21 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue Jiri Olsa
2021-10-25 11:32   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-25 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-10-28  0:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-28  0:16 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-28  2:37   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-28  4:30     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-28  7:19     ` Madhavan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YXad+y2VCyC6y+CE@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).