From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ACBC433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24F360720 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242889AbhJ0QBn (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:01:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242862AbhJ0QBg (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:01:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3EEC0613B9 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id nn3-20020a17090b38c300b001a03bb6c4ebso2435787pjb.1 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DN0M028IcPxor16NY4zNQ6KdrEsEqQ5iFPl6MyAoGPA=; b=Hkhe7iGI0K8SRI1G3HZ34zmXt2hr2U6Wv23X5uzs9hqgrmoqBYpKYqOkWURliScyfl IvDZ+wE+pmZvg1s6bdM1DVjTdwZ6KV9UyabipNaL9+HIH7G+orE6YRkq1gaSF1jeagkO J34i0OloyLcSwHnEnauUleIQOi5a/xeGJYriA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DN0M028IcPxor16NY4zNQ6KdrEsEqQ5iFPl6MyAoGPA=; b=oqtsLfenSuuzQG84z+krczdQdLl0/5WqadHVuw1MHnVFvkScA1hgZwxz1P2C+DnHdt jvG5tkn2b1qLDuXSKNsM+c/OqjV5URyW+wgOmA6Voa8QjzNzz8dcA7Z9ZX3LCUIM4NPG jeRmh4ZimgpU2I9BluHiaj2KFwYgpBsZYnbD+WOAhpYlLl2W4I/AuxABm6hP/UgdmhHn kht1O10BAfVbBl/k+xzlKjnu7GlQKugRAqDx8sQpBj0emkPO8gmXEHWab6JoIVyeb5A0 JQM9NoINM2Pa5nur1h34VKdIrUeo/1wYZV0G3fUxotgoyb3oMyx4rZg0jCEs7fSoZ/ci URsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Nu3fOoktbFr4Gs8ZHkaqd3aYfd7ng8LIg/SzvXPzhOJstyvmv I3GOwPvxRLd4BgAiDgY/ZojyEJFUXkEJpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzG8mDMEBfswvzruxZuiMix01R6gOyZzzx38cUqlAm2dSx9WAjyiVtH8UA12FRXcQgLpTLiLw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa08:b0:13f:eb2e:8ce8 with SMTP id be8-20020a170902aa0800b0013feb2e8ce8mr29833672plb.0.1635350349227; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:201:5ca8:d6ca:59bb:2694]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id f203sm386161pfa.112.2021.10.27.08.59.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:59:07 -0700 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: tjiang@codeaurora.org Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, luiz.dentz@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bgodavar@codeaurora.org, c-hbandi@codeaurora.org, hemantg@codeaurora.org, rjliao@codeaurora.org, zijuhu@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for variant WCN6855 by using different nvm Message-ID: References: <1d19afff955cdc8d47582297a26246d9@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:12:07PM +0800, tjiang@codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi Matthias: > the previous patch is submitted by zijun , as he is not working on this > project, I take over his job, so can we assume abandon the previous patch, > using my new patch ? thank you. > regards. Your patch is clearly based on zijun's one, it even has the same subject. A change of authorship shouldn't result in resetting the version number, it's still the same patch/series. You can always add a 'Co-developed-by:' tag to indicate that someone else contributed to a patch, or use a 'From:' tag if you only made minor changes on top of someone else's work. Not sure how to proceed best with the version number, especially since there are already 3 versions of the 'new' patch. Either option can create confusion, I guess you can continue with the new scheme, it seems the patch is almost ready to land anyway.