From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE73C433F5 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C8561208 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235228AbhKGIcC (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 03:32:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45414 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229966AbhKGIb5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 03:31:57 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0538161101; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:29:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1636273754; bh=Cw4mcFHOW+d1qOkd6B9pcfhOqnJaP9Qk7Xmz88ff2X4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yo7Pf9aSKbpP2pID2VOZUUzdpnMGQziZIVWi0Cf3qigJ84gMiH4x/CMxdDofzdGpO 4d9/hbl3fiE7Fcxj8213FBNGG/lSiyZa/L3Ih81q03X5PIG2FLUotR/NaCINHAkXZ1 Th/HiPRamY9S93cVTs7Przu4LJAAu58EjjWrdEFQ= Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 09:29:08 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] device property: Adding fwnode_irq_get_by_name() Message-ID: References: <20211106173909.34255-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211106173909.34255-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 11:09:08PM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote: > While working on an IIO driver I was told to use of_irq_get_byname() as > the generic version is not available in property.c. > I wish to work on this and have written a function that may work. > I am not sure about its correctness so I am posting this patch early for > review. Please test your code, and also provide a user for it. We can not take new functions that no one uses as that usually means they do not work. thanks, greg k-h