From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6C1C433EF for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347560AbhKYG3h (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:29:37 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43402 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349176AbhKYG1g (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:27:36 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9083A6101D; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:24:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1637821465; bh=OUHkcVCFse0J7BEGfxwpXVHQjULRa183gmW3DhVOVzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Qn3yd5IQcUBLumra6MbcJFAIPOf8OqDjI7qIqwFxsid5jZBOcCxk5F+IQj3B6Ip7z QqhFHXr9jWHgKknJEuwegAgx44CXOCnQNzFCSQTcPHE7SV2P86AfD8Uqq92MmrNLh9 jqDl+7itHkONUcDsPqxhfgiFA6muvz7Ll91LcWXrb7hDbaXgPPRLMxgKG10Hb9Gdt+ MxevFkBBZa5+AvMtp9SiwttBJdng7t+x+tokhxC7IZLhmuU6tJTF/v7T//VZRlViYM ihLI372pzxcZh6asaA0aHE45mhBjBpdyktuCn3iAnmnvz6uZIlGkKVjjwVg7K7AmdK MaqvU0RJQWgWw== Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:24:18 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Vincent Whitchurch , jie.deng@intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@axis.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Viresh Kumar , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Vincent Whitchurch , jie.deng@intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@axis.com References: <20211111160412.11980-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> <20211124185546-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20211125032119.vklsh4yymwnalh5b@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R0vFRG15XN++6TWT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211125032119.vklsh4yymwnalh5b@vireshk-i7> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --R0vFRG15XN++6TWT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Wolfram, you can apply that one as well, it looks okay. Is it? I read that the code only waits for the last request while Michael suggested to wait for all of them? And he did not ack patch 2 while he acked patch 1. Did I misunderstand? --R0vFRG15XN++6TWT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmGfLBIACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZ4PRAAg742+Rz0NTcNl5M51/MewIuKQoW0EhUsi6vJhGVULs2sAwCC8BrR19nn H13DA9pH3GYssOkLmb5XZqVQDwmi1znUniEnwfLnKapLXfy9hV+AW/lf4TemvHN3 AVlzt/85QSxLsMHRCGin0tXw4v5+QOxSU0T6ZU2F78o79Ogh0PL0rGgevF+cGmRs BwIf4aNNUIDKtei8OIQKT6HQmBjWitdcWXEeRWZg6BdJCYlJsmxr9CfXHM1VMwm+ hyGlHkngr60gtf9D5ZRaM6vSccSixzb66HdEqJP4GzCF9BykJMEXp6AXdN3xIVd9 Zg7Y7X0EMvxVpc02185sfwlIAQew9hgNTsmMi3Lpj7rcIT3J2mkJ8rJG7zA9XUhy eeQJUUBd1PFRQhev8JbdB4xAAxWFiMJhrKGHXaJez8SX/BDRPcBC7Iu85sZSQfc9 tyQtNW+gG7NxTScIYVU0JNDDCp/ehMZ6QxDnoewRwOrgPHWPZ5tBDBScXIueZcVj SFtBsJmgITMDbTjDBwM/IeI/TWhKlUv7x+plHw1+LblSiEvkHLjNiToSxBfyx7vD ZrWxEeZlA3VkDGe1IqmHsA6VUVSwY+d4lRF+wW8pIWfy0nmmTRA4h23LsvCXjQzT LNSqLdQhTv4Vgr1OYVpEMC13V88/LifcMth8ZLEHxt0FuoDNaVs= =2AXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R0vFRG15XN++6TWT--