linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Expose group variants of dma ownership interfaces
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 05:27:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZJgMzYzuxjJpWIC@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115020552.2378167-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:05:47AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The vfio needs to set DMA_OWNER_USER for the entire group when attaching

The vfio subsystem?  driver?

> it to a vfio container. So expose group variants of setting/releasing dma
> ownership for this purpose.
> 
> This also exposes the helper iommu_group_dma_owner_unclaimed() for vfio
> report to userspace if the group is viable to user assignment, for

.. for vfio to report .. ?

>  void iommu_device_release_dma_owner(struct device *dev, enum iommu_dma_owner owner);
> +int iommu_group_set_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group, enum iommu_dma_owner owner,
> +			      struct file *user_file);
> +void iommu_group_release_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group, enum iommu_dma_owner owner);

Pleae avoid all these overly long lines.

> +static inline int iommu_group_set_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group,
> +					    enum iommu_dma_owner owner,
> +					    struct file *user_file)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void iommu_group_release_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group,
> +						 enum iommu_dma_owner owner)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool iommu_group_dma_owner_unclaimed(struct iommu_group *group)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}

Why do we need these stubs?  All potential callers should already
require CONFIG_IOMMU_API?  Same for the helpers added in patch 1, btw.

> +	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> +	ret = __iommu_group_set_dma_owner(group, owner, user_file);
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);

> +	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> +	__iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group, owner);
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);

Unless I'm missing something (just skipping over the patches),
the existing callers also take the lock just around these calls,
so we don't really need the __-prefixed lowlevel helpers.

> +	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> +	owner = group->dma_owner;
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);

No need for a lock to read a single scalar.

> +
> +	return owner == DMA_OWNER_NONE;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_dma_owner_unclaimed);

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-15 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15  2:05 [PATCH 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  1:57     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 13:46       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-17  5:22         ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-17 13:35           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18  1:12             ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-18 14:10               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18  2:39         ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-18 13:33           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-19  5:44             ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-19 11:14               ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 15:06                 ` Jörg Rödel
2021-11-19 15:43                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-20 11:16                   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 12:56               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  1:52     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 02/11] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver bind/unbind Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  6:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-15 13:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:38     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:37       ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 15:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 18:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:35           ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:39             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: pci_stub: Suppress kernel DMA ownership auto-claiming Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:14       ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 16:17         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 17:54           ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 18:19             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:44               ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:22             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:58               ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 21:19                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 22:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  6:05     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 20:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  7:24     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 20:22       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 20:48         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] iommu: Add security context management for assigned devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  7:25     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Expose group variants of dma ownership interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:27   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-11-16  9:42     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfio: Use DMA_OWNER_USER to declaim passthrough devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZJgMzYzuxjJpWIC@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).