From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3F0C433EF for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 22:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235576AbhK2Ww4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:52:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36120 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234816AbhK2Wue (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:50:34 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D743C03AA16 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id l8so17520230qtk.6 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:15:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toxicpanda-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5b5qh/kvUmuAxuX6IrP7q82N4vspMTIsdmghaUk1cYw=; b=Bdhtd9WSzPvU7/V8HNa2hTMVtdIsLC0wN52/ZfiCz7euJW4oaVxMP2/kNhJp80Am7h DYp4u0lASiuZiG1Z5TEUOUQRFVxAy2/JnInSxRJYDTNIVMxsaTqu8JZihaXMErA1TPfl EZohXunqEZdSqaHV7IRRV3rUTed8qdM/yfUrMlISenbnKNMs1e96aHwtMGZe1qovHERa 1l6eTXckhtZuH7qVWAFPrq575D/BPWcZMWhqQBnPxSL7MtTRFo9E0qb7/Axi+VPN0V8o G7ek3jPWPfNj3GXvkO7wDWWRNOE8tJEIc7HPQ0FaP3A5xXJgqK2kHm2D58Xky2ISQ0oT m2KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5b5qh/kvUmuAxuX6IrP7q82N4vspMTIsdmghaUk1cYw=; b=7XgdzZHoVcu9js+QnsGaDjhnXjC8KpNasajTtluLPYV7R3VSZ/+bhYDEYdOH1gC6kE gky7u3FnZINmHSuL+KdQIZO3SGuk4T64Z9TU6GJjpziBxiEkFGlnVpvi+uFpvq20yg9F XckndCXRkcqywRNNcbyIaC/4M2eEEuCc5w7zxXYhk3MiQ7KYUDm7Lz4oy5hcV0R7QPj4 tPip6zn18RFj2jQC31KB0ta6J0ByV2mKC4ce5Yq9TDVHlbHR+BkEUaqEA0s9WGh/Gi7d yHveiKU2R65lcrGRPXwisx8dR8/eitn6BwHK84VpzO1pgIqLCiCXAFrxeEqOcRHHHBT7 joYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ul7Gz9SWydRTlnL46dC0P8oIAJ9tejz10D/uaIzQwEZhvEIBI lQMcRTPinDQc1NThJb//SB/gVA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCS7omvq0J3BR4cWJfCQsBbn2Q8/rhwVshyCiOdQYdsmN5CvbQQClg1wniqFXuFXfTTajxxw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:288:: with SMTP id z8mr36944934qtw.526.1638209715216; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:15:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpe-174-109-172-136.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.172.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bl16sm8435585qkb.44.2021.11.29.10.15.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:15:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:15:13 -0500 From: Josef Bacik To: Valentin Schneider Cc: peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 5-10% increase in IO latencies with nohz balance patch Message-ID: References: <87ee6yc00j.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ee6yc00j.mognet@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:03:24PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > Hi Josef, > > On 29/11/21 12:03, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Our nightly performance testing found a performance regression when we rebased > > our devel tree onto v5.16-rc. This took me a few days to bisect down, but this > > patch > > > > 7fd7a9e0caba ("sched/fair: Trigger nohz.next_balance updates when a CPU goes NOHZ-idle") > > > > is the one that introduces the regression. My performance testing box is a 2 > > socket, with a model name "Intel(R) Xeon(R) Bronze 3204 CPU @ 1.90GHz", for a > > total of 12 cpu's reported in cpuinfo. It has 128gib of RAM, and these perf > > tests are being run against a SSD and spinning rust device, but the regression > > is consistent across both configurations. You can see the historical graph of > > the completion latencies for this specific run > > > > http://toxicpanda.com/performance/emptyfiles500k_write_clat_ns_p99.png > > > > Or for something a little more braindead (untar firefox) you can see a increase > > in the runtime > > > > http://toxicpanda.com/performance/untarfirefox_elapsed.png > > > > These two tests are single threaded, the regression doesn't appear to affect > > multi-threaded tests. For a simple reproducer you can simply download a tarball > > of the firefox sources and untar it onto a clean btrfs file system. The time > > before and after this commit goes up ~1-2 seconds on my machine. For a less > > simple test you can create a clean btrfs file system and run > > > > fio --name emptyfiles500k --create_on_open=1 --nrfiles=31250 --readwrite=write \ > > --readwrite=write --ioengine=filecreate --fallocate=none --filesize=4k \ > > --openfiles=1 --alloc-size 98304 --allrandrepeat=1 --randseed=12345 \ > > --directory > > > > And you are looking for the "Write clat ns p99" metric. You'll see a 5-10% > > increase in the latency time. If you want to run our tests directly it's > > relatively easy to setup, you can clone the fsperf repo > > > > https://github.com/josefbacik/fsperf > > > > Then in the fsperf directory edit the local.cfg and add > > > > [main] > > directory=/mnt/test > > > > [btrfs] > > device=/dev/sdc > > iosched=none > > mkfs=mkfs.btrfs -f > > mount=mount -o noatime > > > > And then run the following on the baseline kernel > > > > ./fsperf -p regression -c btrfs -n 10 emptyfiles500k > > > > This will run the test 10 times and save the results to the database. Then you > > can boot into your changed kernel and runn > > > > ./fsperf -p regrssion -c btrfs -n 10 -t emptyfiles500k > > > > This will run the test 10 times and take the average and compare it to the > > baseline and print out the values, you'll see the increase latency values there. > > > > I can reproduce this at will, if you want to just throw patches at me I'm happy > > to run it and let you know what happens. I'm attaching my .config as well in > > case that is needed, but the HZ and PREEMPT settings are > > > > CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=y > > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y > > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y > > CONFIG_HZ_1000=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPT=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y > > CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y > > CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y > > Thanks for the report! > > That patch you bisected does add more NOHZ kicks that aren't time-gated > like nohz.next_blocked / nohz.next_balance, so I'm thinking that a > pathological scenario would be a low-period bursty task which keeps > flicking a CPU idle/!idle. SCHED_SOFTIRQ running the NOHZ work on the > task's previous CPU would then repeatedly delay / force the task to be > placed on another CPU. > > Would you happen to have execution traces by any chance? If not I should be > able to get one out of that fsperf thingie. > I don't, if you want to tell me how I can do it right now. I've disabled everything on this box for now so it's literally just sitting there waiting to have things done to it. Thanks, Josef