From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, guro@fb.com,
riel@surriel.com, minchan@kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
aarcange@redhat.com, christian@brauner.io, hch@infradead.org,
oleg@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, jannh@google.com,
shakeelb@google.com, luto@kernel.org,
christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, fweimer@redhat.com,
jengelh@inai.de, timmurray@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: protect free_pgtables with mmap_lock write lock in exit_mmap
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:55:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbHEgLi1g1XtsOgh@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208212211.2860249-1-surenb@google.com>
On Wed 08-12-21 13:22:09, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> oom-reaper and process_mrelease system call should protect against
> races with exit_mmap which can destroy page tables while they
> walk the VMA tree. oom-reaper protects from that race by setting
> MMF_OOM_VICTIM and by relying on exit_mmap to set MMF_OOM_SKIP
> before taking and releasing mmap_write_lock. process_mrelease has
> to elevate mm->mm_users to prevent such race. Both oom-reaper and
> process_mrelease hold mmap_read_lock when walking the VMA tree.
> The locking rules and mechanisms could be simpler if exit_mmap takes
> mmap_write_lock while executing destructive operations such as
> free_pgtables.
> Change exit_mmap to hold the mmap_write_lock when calling
> free_pgtables and remove_vma. Operations like unmap_vmas and
> unlock_range are not destructive and could run under mmap_read_lock
> but for simplicity we take one mmap_write_lock during almost the entire
> operation.
unlock_range is not safe to be called under read lock. See 27ae357fa82b
("mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap, v3").
> Note also that because oom-reaper checks VM_LOCKED flag,
> unlock_range() should not be allowed to race with it.
> Before this patch, remove_vma used to be called with no locks held,
> however with fput being executed asynchronously and vm_ops->close
> not being allowed to hold mmap_lock (it is called from __split_vma
> with mmap_sem held for write), changing that should be fine.
> In most cases this lock should be uncontended. Previously, Kirill
> reported ~4% regression caused by a similar change [1]. We reran the
> same test and although the individual results are quite noisy, the
> percentiles show lower regression with 1.6% being the worst case [2].
> The change allows oom-reaper and process_mrelease to execute safely
> under mmap_read_lock without worries that exit_mmap might destroy page
> tables from under them.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20170725141723.ivukwhddk2voyhuc@node.shutemov.name/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpGC9-c9P40x7oy=jy5SphMcd0o0G_6U1-+JAziGKG6dGA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
The patch looks good otherwise. Btw. when I was trying to do something
similar in the past Hugh has noted that we can get rid of the same
lock&&unlock trick in ksm. Maybe you want to have a look at that as well
;)
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> changes in v4
> - Separated comments describing vm_operations_struct::close locking
> requirements into a separate patch, per Matthew Wilcox
>
> mm/mmap.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index bfb0ea164a90..f4e09d390a07 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -3142,25 +3142,27 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> * to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in
> * __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block.
> *
> - * This needs to be done before calling munlock_vma_pages_all(),
> + * This needs to be done before calling unlock_range(),
> * which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot
> * reliably test it.
> */
> (void)__oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
>
> set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
> - mmap_write_lock(mm);
> - mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> }
>
> + mmap_write_lock(mm);
> if (mm->locked_vm)
> unlock_range(mm->mmap, ULONG_MAX);
>
> arch_exit_mmap(mm);
>
> vma = mm->mmap;
> - if (!vma) /* Can happen if dup_mmap() received an OOM */
> + if (!vma) {
> + /* Can happen if dup_mmap() received an OOM */
> + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> return;
> + }
>
> lru_add_drain();
> flush_cache_mm(mm);
> @@ -3171,16 +3173,14 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
>
> - /*
> - * Walk the list again, actually closing and freeing it,
> - * with preemption enabled, without holding any MM locks.
> - */
> + /* Walk the list again, actually closing and freeing it. */
> while (vma) {
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_ACCOUNT)
> nr_accounted += vma_pages(vma);
> vma = remove_vma(vma);
> cond_resched();
> }
> + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> vm_unacct_memory(nr_accounted);
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1.400.ga245620fadb-goog
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 21:22 [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: protect free_pgtables with mmap_lock write lock in exit_mmap Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: document locking restrictions for vm_operations_struct::close Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-09 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/oom_kill: allow process_mrelease to run under mmap_lock protection Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-09 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-09 19:03 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-09 8:55 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-12-09 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: protect free_pgtables with mmap_lock write lock in exit_mmap Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-10 9:20 ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-09 9:12 ` [PATCH 4/3] mm: drop MMF_OOM_SKIP from exit_mmap Michal Hocko
2021-12-09 16:24 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-09 16:47 ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-09 17:06 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-16 2:26 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-16 11:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-12-16 17:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-30 5:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-12-30 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-30 17:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-01-03 12:11 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-03 21:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-01-04 22:24 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbHEgLi1g1XtsOgh@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).