From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: QiuLaibin <qiulaibin@huawei.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] blk-throttle: Set BIO_THROTTLED when bio has been throttled
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:12:30 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbepLpyMPqP2ao3J@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03964258-10ff-7f19-10cb-ca4eccf72848@huawei.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 05:24:00PM +0800, QiuLaibin wrote:
> > * This function is called synchronously on the issue path. The bio isn't
> > seen by the queue and device driver yet and nothing can race to issue it
> > before this function returns.
> >
>
> The bio is under throttle here, this submit_bio return directly. And
> current process will queue a dispatch work by
> throtl_schedule_pending_timer() to submit this bio before BIO_THROTTLED flag
> set. If the bio is completed quickly after the dispatch work is queued, UAF
> of bio will happen.
You are right, the timer can get to it. Can't it be solved by just
reordering spin_unlock and setting BIO_THROTTLED?
> > * Now we're not setting BIO_THROTTLED when we're taking a different return
> > path through the out_unlock label and risks calling back into blk_throtl
> > again on the same bio.
> >
>
> In my opinion, This flag can prevent the request from being throttled
> multiple times. If the request itself does not need to be throttled, the
> result of repeated entry will be the same.
> If necessary, I think we can use other methods to achieve this effect for
> request does not need to be throttled.
So that we don't change anything regarding this?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 13:15 [PATCH -next] blk-throttle: Set BIO_THROTTLED when bio has been throttled Laibin Qiu
2021-11-29 18:16 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-13 9:24 ` QiuLaibin
2021-12-13 20:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2021-12-14 9:12 ` QiuLaibin
2022-01-06 19:52 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbepLpyMPqP2ao3J@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiulaibin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).