From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056A5C433FE for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237416AbhLUMGk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:06:40 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:39565 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234070AbhLUMGi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:06:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1640088398; x=1671624398; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=U/WOkGr5BYeL7TPyqZEIOXMu2gqejtYukgr7Rxu83DU=; b=OhL+my49Jk36HdTIMTckeiEX+IQSHVMslfRO5WHkAlInTbeJV+b6nx0T MsgtgkUP+yiJirlCVkmt126xC1PqygGLKj8r+FqTzq2AuWsaDOXaepXpA VsHCCEDcAhFGG73h9FEDfqfdpRDGds/Zv/SKFk3OzoOlhiZohyJBUXjvs 5VenQasxSpCjhd1Q+8hI7lwXYDdRPadqZ4pLNUlHD3Py5OLoJACAOZcke X0rcv23P+YxiURV0UHuaWFNlbN6+c2zfDVWNvVmUGQNBuSkGQaFLV9Br9 W85z2OdMH6HZVdO57I+w+BjAzNCBdPd7CSQAA5BAgX9th6be8wafRJOct g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10204"; a="227231644" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,223,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="227231644" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2021 04:06:33 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,223,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="570193030" Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.42]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2021 04:06:29 -0800 Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paasikivi.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FA4F203BA; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:06:27 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:06:27 +0200 From: Sakari Ailus To: hugues.fruchet@st.com, Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com Cc: prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com, jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, slongerbeam@gmail.com, paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com, prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com, mchehab@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] media: i2c: ov5640: Remain in power down for DVP mode unless streaming Message-ID: References: <20200904201835.5958-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20200904201835.5958-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <8b5d4928-2921-b876-7d1e-04bb42eff4fa@st.com> <3b54ab9b-4ffd-ab32-d495-fad6132ea504@microchip.com> <5c56c87d-ca48-5573-0606-da1441fab7ff@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c56c87d-ca48-5573-0606-da1441fab7ff@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hugues, Eugen, On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:37:47AM +0000, Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com wrote: > On 6/29/21 1:47 PM, Eugen Hristev - M18282 wrote: > > On 9/9/20 7:16 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > >> Hi Prabhakar, > >> > >> As discussed separately I would prefer to better understand issue before > >> going to this patch. > >> Nevertheless I have some remarks in code in case we'll need it at the end. > >> > >> On 9/4/20 10:18 PM, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > >>> Keep the sensor in software power down mode and wake up only in > >>> ov5640_set_stream_dvp() callback. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar > >>> Reviewed-by: Biju Das > >>> Tested-by: Jacopo Mondi > >>> --- > >>> drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c > >>> index 2fe4a7ac0592..880fde73a030 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c > >>> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ > >>> #define OV5640_REG_SYS_RESET02 0x3002 > >>> #define OV5640_REG_SYS_CLOCK_ENABLE02 0x3006 > >>> #define OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0 0x3008 > >>> +#define OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0_SW_PWDN 0x42 > >>> +#define OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0_SW_PWUP 0x02 > >> > >> For the time being this section was only referring to registers > >> addresses and bit details was explained into a comment right before > >> affectation, see OV5640_REG_IO_MIPI_CTRL00 for example. > >> > >>> #define OV5640_REG_CHIP_ID 0x300a > >>> #define OV5640_REG_IO_MIPI_CTRL00 0x300e > >>> #define OV5640_REG_PAD_OUTPUT_ENABLE01 0x3017 > >>> @@ -1120,6 +1122,12 @@ static int ov5640_load_regs(struct ov5640_dev *sensor, > >>> val = regs->val; > >>> mask = regs->mask; > >>> > >>> + /* remain in power down mode for DVP */ > >>> + if (regs->reg_addr == OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0 && > >>> + val == OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0_SW_PWUP && > >>> + sensor->ep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) > >>> + continue; > >>> + > >> > >> I understand that more or less register OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0 (0x3008) > >> has been partially removed from big init sequence: for power-up part, > >> but power-dwn remains at very beginning of sequence. > >> We should completely remove 0x3008 from init sequence, including > >> power-dwn, and introduce a new function ov5640_sw_powerdown(on/off) that > >> should be called at the right place instead. > >> > >> > >>> if (mask) > >>> ret = ov5640_mod_reg(sensor, reg_addr, mask, val); > >>> else > >>> @@ -1297,9 +1305,14 @@ static int ov5640_set_stream_dvp(struct ov5640_dev *sensor, bool on) > >>> * PAD OUTPUT ENABLE 02 > >>> * - [7:2]: D[5:0] output enable > >>> */ > >>> - return ov5640_write_reg(sensor, > >>> - OV5640_REG_PAD_OUTPUT_ENABLE02, > >>> - on ? 0xfc : 0); > >>> + ret = ov5640_write_reg(sensor, OV5640_REG_PAD_OUTPUT_ENABLE02, > >>> + on ? 0xfc : 0); > >>> + if (ret) > >>> + return ret; > >>> + > >>> + return ov5640_write_reg(sensor, OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0, on ? > >>> + OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0_SW_PWUP : > >>> + OV5640_REG_SYS_CTRL0_SW_PWDN); > >>> } > >>> > >>> static int ov5640_set_stream_mipi(struct ov5640_dev *sensor, bool on) > >>> > >> > >> > >> BR, > >> Hugues. > >> > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > When I updated driver in my tree with this patch, I noticed that my > > setup using the ATMEL isc platform + ov5640 in parallel bus mode stopped > > working. > > > > It looks like the culprit is this patch. > > I am not sure which is the best way to fix it. > > It looks like initially things work fine when probing the driver, but > > when we want to start streaming at a later point, the register SYS_CTRL0 > > cannot be written anymore. > > Here is an output of the log: > > > > --- Opening /dev/video0... > > Trying source module v4l2... > > /dev/video0 opened. > > No input was specified, using the first. > > ov5640 1-003c: ov5640_write_reg: error: reg=3008, val=2 > > atmel-sama5d2-isc f0008000.isc: stream on failed in subdev -121 > > Error starting stream. > > VIDIOC_STREAMON: Remote I/O error > > Unable to use mmap. Using read instead. > > Unable to use read. > > > > I am using a simple application to read from /dev/video0 (which is > > registered by the atmel-isc once the sensor probed) > > > > I have a feeling that something is wrong related to power, but I cannot > > tell for sure. > > > > Reverting this patch makes it work fine again. > > > > Help is appreciated, > > Thanks, > > Eugen > > > > > Gentle ping. > > I would like to send a revert patch if nobody cares about this > driver/patch except me. Hugues: any thoughts on this? Without knowing much about the sensor, the stated intent of the patch seems reasonable. But if it breaks things, then reverting it sounds like a good idea until a proper fix is available. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus