From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB00BC433F5 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245518AbhLVNzr (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:55:47 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:42978 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245500AbhLVNzn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:55:43 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (dslb-088-067-202-008.088.067.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.67.202.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id F12831EC02B9; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:55:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1640181338; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=he7eWKUPElrIPI1ScosoCtObtf9WSTmqL/yiphcOaLk=; b=R/Gp6TWCLfFVbdh5BZVWrLNWrLDGXe0GYTVNoeEUkhxj5rhv1gi1OsF6lRqxZa7X5FK2eP DaXantaHkhtBgIXtSojG5h+c5uqK5foXwIAhMdvy/MDZW5yN0flcarhA5sxa1j2QW/V8tL mQYhpbTRA+SlVRFQzz9U8jVEhtcnXsg= Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:55:39 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: hch Cc: Richard Weinberger , anton ivanov , x86 , linux-um , linux-kernel Subject: Re: remove set_fs for UML Message-ID: References: <20211215165612.554426-1-hch@lst.de> <1202521211.191037.1640120703350.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20211222081753.GB22041@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211222081753.GB22041@lst.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:17:53AM +0100, hch wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:05:03PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > So far UML seems to work with these changes applied. :-) > > I have applied both patches to my UML tree for now, I assume x86 maintainers are fine with > > patch 1/2? > > Looks like patch 1 needs this fixup for some configurations, where > pci.h doesn't get pulled into kvm by other means. > > But we probably want an ACK from the x86 maintainers to be sure anyway.. I don't see why not so Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Should I take the first one along with this hunk below? > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c > index 0c76c45fdb686..fad546df0bbac 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include "spte.h" > > #include > +#include > #include > > static bool __read_mostly enable_mmio_caching = true; -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette