linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
Cc: contact@emersion.fr, airlied@linux.ie,
	alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, marex@denx.de,
	linux-imx@nxp.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, yannick.fertre@foss.st.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, philippe.cornu@foss.st.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
	shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/plane: Make format_mod_supported truly optional
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:56:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YcRkB7uWyt4EbcZm@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211222090552.25972-2-jose.exposito89@gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:05:47AM +0100, José Expósito wrote:
> The documentation for "drm_plane_funcs.format_mod_supported" reads:
> 
>   This *optional* hook is used for the DRM to determine if the given
>   format/modifier combination is valid for the plane. This allows the
>   DRM to generate the correct format bitmask (which formats apply to
>   which modifier), and to validate modifiers at atomic_check time.
> 
>   *If not present*, then any modifier in the plane's modifier
>   list is allowed with any of the plane's formats.
> 
> However, where the function is not present, an invalid IN_FORMATS blob
> property with modifiers but no formats is exposed to user-space.
> 
> This breaks the latest Weston [1]. For testing purposes, I extracted the
> affected code to a standalone program [2].
> 
> Make "create_in_format_blob" behave as documented.
> 
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/blob/9.0/libweston/backend-drm/kms.c#L431
> [2] https://github.com/JoseExposito/drm-sandbox/blob/main/in_formats.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c
> index 82afb854141b..c1186b7215ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c
> @@ -202,17 +202,13 @@ static int create_in_format_blob(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_plane *plane
>  
>  	memcpy(formats_ptr(blob_data), plane->format_types, formats_size);
>  
> -	/* If we can't determine support, just bail */
> -	if (!plane->funcs->format_mod_supported)
> -		goto done;
> -
>  	mod = modifiers_ptr(blob_data);
>  	for (i = 0; i < plane->modifier_count; i++) {
>  		for (j = 0; j < plane->format_count; j++) {
> -			if (plane->funcs->format_mod_supported(plane,
> +			if (!plane->funcs->format_mod_supported ||
> +			    plane->funcs->format_mod_supported(plane,
>  							       plane->format_types[j],
>  							       plane->modifiers[i])) {

So instead of skipping the whole loop you just skip doing anything
inside the loop? Can't see how that achieves anything at all.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/83018/
is what I had in mind earlier but no one reviewed it and 
the discussion veered off track IIRC.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-23 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-22  9:05 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add missing format_mod_supported functions José Expósito
2021-12-22  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/plane: Make format_mod_supported truly optional José Expósito
2021-12-23 10:10   ` Simon Ser
2021-12-23 11:56   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-12-23 13:42     ` Simon Ser
2021-12-23 15:03       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-23 16:57         ` José Expósito
2021-12-22  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/plane: Fix typo in format_mod_supported documentation José Expósito
2021-12-23 10:07   ` Simon Ser
2021-12-22  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/simple-kms: Drop format_mod_supported function José Expósito
2021-12-22  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/display: " José Expósito
2021-12-22  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm: mxsfb: " José Expósito
2021-12-22  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/stm: ltdc: " José Expósito
2022-01-12  9:44   ` yannick Fertre
2022-01-12 10:01   ` Jagan Teki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YcRkB7uWyt4EbcZm@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=contact@emersion.fr \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.exposito89@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=philippe.cornu@foss.st.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=yannick.fertre@foss.st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).