From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6702BC433FE for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232366AbhL1NTE (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:19:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231948AbhL1NTD (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:19:03 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F234CC061574; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id b186-20020a1c1bc3000000b00345734afe78so10070108wmb.0; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:19:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=bDb0kJmueK3fnTgDSSIcWoJthheJr9w8Abj9HHv7swQ=; b=FTDuvcxdYNW7UadnMddK9oxiBXuuJ5PAmhjpyNfoLFMkbI0SGHcwDTYOZtPh3P4LNu SlYeakemUlH4lk+KGt+vVxFkQYR8zQcxx0kPmuUcojedlmoByThe+5n+IMgh9ZBJJeBY URxkq+NtoiKXY1IwlSNP1tr7GYSVeHTQfPa6DclUWL0VWMWUGRPs8/QgmEneQS97ujMP JSt0+lDCMpoHIwNZR0cYAzI6d4ASWZnnMlFqYRNxmHjCP7fFyqw2vc8aGZaAp358U1QX pMWoAUaK47/c450dEoRm8UV9QPn7mZDKsAq7WCIQPgH/1zvsE3ZPVTx/zzRt/2kpbmp4 GLcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=bDb0kJmueK3fnTgDSSIcWoJthheJr9w8Abj9HHv7swQ=; b=ie/a4zqRPG6km8WfAB29DNsJC2E864WbDhC51+fPl6OjHUIXviZnY2uXxyiuSsxkQE zOODjxid7HxDZ5YlZxOQBdtDPLOQHOM2ozTxAAZZQtKAejyinX7M5WYCsHNVOr5QyDQM 5HqSZ7WDwu7ZnWuTV7x+h2+eMACQPHlqE5TXcFg80hkPtC4wBYbp8bzbkBzs6FkDPj7y ouwjlrZKUcTGPRt5o9Q8LFEbardoRADOhwakUrggRE1l5TxQqrDDG342sLBbmuX9/2YK ukJTOos2qOOvPSsviaNqRktdU8qOr0VbZ24A+SlkDpJGY4zdMAZt/ffW3fXFB2muSx8L JUBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WY9DAOqNatu1/oDWXeowquP8UMkViiPnjPciY7GHdMOJrlTLa r5hySA2AQv7zembXQjSIwnkh0VJV5Q4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiX3X/0tZB+xVwJu3lM6W4EPCt7X5IbOrgwu3OHuV9wg/6pVAniTNqzXAgKA26gOlS8FLLYw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9897:: with SMTP id a145mr17134708wme.194.1640697541584; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm20208694wri.98.2021.12.28.05.19.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:19:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:18:59 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/38] 4.19.223-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211227151319.379265346@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211227151319.379265346@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 04:30:37PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.223 release. > There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/554 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip