From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 15:37:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdYrw4eiQPryOMkZ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56c53b027ae8ae6909d38904bf089e73011657d7.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:35:00AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 04:55:06PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > case IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG:
> > > - fallthrough;
> > > + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * The IMA signature is based on a hash of IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG
> > > + * and the fs-verity file digest, not directly on the
> > > + * fs-verity file digest. Both digests should probably be
> > > + * included in the IMA measurement list, but for now this
> > > + * digest is only used for verifying the IMA signature.
> > > + */
> > > + verity_digest[0] = IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG;
> > > + memcpy(verity_digest + 1, iint->ima_hash->digest,
> > > + iint->ima_hash->length);
> > > +
> > > + hash.hdr.algo = iint->ima_hash->algo;
> > > + hash.hdr.length = iint->ima_hash->length;
> >
> > This is still wrong because the bytes being signed don't include the hash
> > algorithm. Unless you mean for it to be implicitly always SHA-256? fs-verity
> > supports SHA-512 too, and it may support other hash algorithms in the future.
>
> IMA assumes that the file hash algorithm and the signature algorithm
> are the same. If they're not the same, for whatever reason, the
> signature verification would simply fail.
>
> Based on the v2 signature header 'type' field, IMA can differentiate
> between regular IMA file hash based signatures and fs-verity file
> digest based signatures. The digest field (d-ng) in the IMA
> meausrement list prefixes the digest with the hash algorithm. I'm
> missing the reason for needing to hash fs-verity's file digest with
> other metadata, and sign that hash rather than fs-verity's file digest
> directly.
Because if someone signs a raw hash, then they also implicitly sign the same
hash value for all supported hash algorithms that produce the same length hash.
Signing a raw hash is only appropriate when there is only 1 supported algorithm.
All the other stuff you mentioned is irrelevant.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 21:55 [PATCH v1 0/5] ima: support fs-verity signatures stored as Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 21:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] fs-verity: define a function to return the integrity protected file digest Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 22:15 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-02 21:55 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] ima: define a new signature type named IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 21:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] ima: limit including fs-verity's file digest in measurement list Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 22:22 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-02 22:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 21:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 22:07 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-02 22:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 22:18 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-31 15:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-05 23:37 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-01-09 20:45 ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-01-09 21:07 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-15 5:31 ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-01-15 6:21 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-16 3:31 ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-16 5:24 ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-19 0:49 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-19 15:41 ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-16 17:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-19 0:39 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-20 16:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-20 21:05 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-02 21:55 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] fsverity: update the documentation Mimi Zohar
2021-12-02 22:09 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdYrw4eiQPryOMkZ@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).