linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>
Cc: "will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
	"quic_qiancai@quicinc.com" <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64/mm: avoid fixmap race condition when create pud mapping
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:42:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdgZJ/mBG+BCxmEv@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM9PR08MB7276B412F02CA0431E30E06CF44D9@AM9PR08MB7276.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 09:10:57AM +0000, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
> 
> I roughly find the root cause.
>  alloc_init_pud will be called at the very beginning of kernel boot in create_mapping_noalloc where no memory allocator is initialized. But lockdep check may need allocate memory. So, kernel take exception when acquire lock.(I have not found the exact code that cause this issue) that's say we may not be able to use a lock so early.
> 
> I come up with 2 methods to address it. 
> 1) skip dead lock check at the very beginning of kernel boot in lockdep code.
> 2) provided 2 two versions of __create_pgd_mapping, one with lock in
> it and the other without. There may be no possible of race for memory
> mapping at the very beginning time of kernel boot, thus we can use the
> no lock version of __create_pgd_mapping safely.
> In my test, this issue is gone if there is no lock held in
> create_mapping_noalloc. I think create_mapping_noalloc is called early
> enough to avoid the race conditions of memory mapping, however, I have
> not proved it.

I think method 2 would work better but rather than implementing new
nolock functions I'd add a NO_LOCK flag and check it in
alloc_init_pud() before mutex_lock/unlock. Also add a comment when
passing the NO_LOCK flag on why it's needed and why there wouldn't be
any races at that stage (early boot etc.)

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-07 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-16  8:28 [PATCH v3] arm64/mm: avoid fixmap race condition when create pud mapping Jianyong Wu
2021-12-16 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-17  9:30 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-17 10:09   ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-05 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-06 10:13   ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-06 15:56     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-07  9:10       ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-07 10:42         ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-01-26  4:20           ` Justin He
2022-01-26  8:36             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-26 10:09               ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-26 10:12                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-26 10:17                   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:28                     ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-26 10:30                       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:31                         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-27  6:24                           ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-27 12:22                             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-27 12:34                               ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-31  8:13                                 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-31  8:10                               ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-27  1:31               ` Justin He
2022-01-07 10:53         ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YdgZJ/mBG+BCxmEv@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=Jianyong.Wu@arm.com \
    --cc=Justin.He@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).