linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	pjt@google.com, posk@google.com, avagin@google.com,
	jannh@google.com, tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:04:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YeVpdj/OP+qfAztn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211221171900.GA580323@dev-hv>

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 05:19:00PM +0000, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:44:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +static struct task_struct *umcg_get_task(u32 tid)
> > +{
> > +	struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (tid) {
> > +		rcu_read_lock();
> > +		tsk = find_task_by_vpid(tid);
> > +		if (tsk && current->mm == tsk->mm && tsk->umcg_task)
> 
> This essentially limits all operations to a single mm/process.
> Fine for now, but a fast remote context switch is also a valid use
> case. It is not directly related to userspace scheduling, so I'm
> just mentioning it here. Maybe server-to-server cross-process
> context switches should be allowed for the same user/cgroup? (Again,
> this is for later to consider).

Doing cross-address-space UMCG will be a massive effort, too much
(pretty much everything) in this implementation assumes things are
directly addressable.

> > +			get_task_struct(tsk);
> > +		else
> > +			tsk = NULL;
> > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return tsk;
> > +}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 20:44 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched/umcg: add WF_CURRENT_CPU and externise ttwu Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86/uaccess: Implement unsafe_try_cmpxchg_user() Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-20 17:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-21 11:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-21 17:19   ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-14 14:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-14 15:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-14 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 11:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 12:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 12:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-18 10:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-18 18:19         ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-19  8:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19 17:33             ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-19  8:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19  8:59           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19 17:52             ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-20 10:37               ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-12-24 11:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 21:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15  3:46 ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 10:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 13:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 17:56     ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 18:18       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 19:49         ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 22:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 23:26             ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-16 13:23               ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-15 18:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 21:04         ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 23:16           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 23:31             ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 10:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 13:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-15 17:54       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YeVpdj/OP+qfAztn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=avagin@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=posk@google.com \
    --cc=posk@posk.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).