linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Cc: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
	straube.linux@gmail.com, martin@kaiser.cx,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] staging: r8188eu: remove DBG_88E calls from os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:48:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfEm4t+fhO4I2uDW@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5bbe488-ac43-fd89-7c65-36bfa9c903a6@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 01:26:08PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
> 
> On 1/26/22 04:13, Phillip Potter wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> }
> > > 
> > > And here you also removes the reads. I guess, some kind of magic pattern is
> > > used
> > > 
> > 
> > So these calls are macro arguments, they would never be executed under
> > normal circumstances anyway, unless the rtw_debug kernel module was
> > passed in as 5 or more - it is 1 by default. The DBG_88E macro would
> > expand during preprocessing phase to (for example):
> > 
> > do {
> > 	if (5 <= GlobalDebugLevel)
> > 		pr_info("R8188EU: " "dbg(0x450) = 0x%x\n", rtw_read32(padapter, 0x450));
> > } while (0)
> > 
> > As this is never executed under normal circumstances anyway, I would say
> > calls like these are therefore safe to remove. Happy to be convinced
> > though :-) Many thanks.
> > 
> 
> I see your point, thanks for explanation.
> 
> Well, in this case, you may left all reads, that are executed during normal
> lifetime of a driver. We know, that there is at least 1 place, where read()
> call removal can break things. Might be there are couple of other places we
> don't know about.
> 
> IMHO the best thing you can do is to leave these reads and leave a comment
> like "hey, please remove me and test". One day useless reads should be
> anyway removed, since ideally rtw_read family must get __must_check
> annotation + normal error handling.

No, if these were never getting called in normal operation, there's no
need to add them back.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-24 22:44 [PATCH 00/10] Cleanup and removal of DBG_88E macro Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] staging: r8188eu: remove previously added dev_dbg and netdev_dbg calls Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] staging: r8188eu: remove smaller sets of DBG_88E calls from core dir Phillip Potter
2022-01-25  9:02   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-26  0:54     ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-26  6:00       ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-25 18:17   ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-26  1:00     ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] staging: r8188eu: remove DBG_88E calls from core/rtw_mlme_ext.c Phillip Potter
2022-01-25  7:22   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-25 18:31   ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-26  1:02     ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] staging: r8188eu: remove all DBG_88E calls from hal dir Phillip Potter
2022-01-25  8:27   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] staging: r8188eu: remove smaller sets of DBG_88E calls from os_dep dir Phillip Potter
2022-01-25 12:48   ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-25 12:59     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-25 13:04       ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-25 13:07         ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-26  0:58     ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging: r8188eu: remove DBG_88E calls from os_dep/ioctl_linux.c Phillip Potter
2022-01-25  9:31   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-25 19:03   ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-26  1:13     ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-26 10:26       ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-26 10:48         ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-01-26 10:58           ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-01-26 11:14             ` Greg KH
2022-01-27  8:53         ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: r8188eu: remove DBG_88E call from include/usb_ops.h Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] staging: r8188eu: remove all remaining aliased DBG_88E calls Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] staging: r8188eu: remove DBG_88E macro definition Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] staging: r8188eu: remove GlobalDebugLevel flag Phillip Potter
2022-01-25 15:33 ` [PATCH 00/10] Cleanup and removal of DBG_88E macro Greg KH
2022-01-26  0:45   ` Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:50 [RESENT PATCH 00/10] staging: r8188eu: " Phillip Potter
2022-01-24 22:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging: r8188eu: remove DBG_88E calls from os_dep/ioctl_linux.c Phillip Potter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfEm4t+fhO4I2uDW@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).