From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Daniel Díaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 0000/1033] 5.16.3-rc2 review
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:16:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfI4oDEY7W4lxWZP@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ddd3f2e1-ed1d-82ce-cc8e-562be2ae5152@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:11:47PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We didn't get the notification for this release candidate. Thanks for the heads up, Guenter!
Yes, as I responded to Guenter, no one did, that was a bug in my scripts
due to the size of this series :(
> On 1/25/22 10:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.3 release.
> > There are 1033 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.3-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.16.3-rc2
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-5.16.y
> * git commit: 39cb7e05eaf4fd55c6445fe8fe9ffa7f8d329205
> * git describe: v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4
> * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4
>
> ## No test Regressions (compared to v5.16.2)
>
> ## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.2)
>
> ## No test Fixes (compared to v5.16.2)
>
> ## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.2)
>
> ## Test result summary
> total: 105828, pass: 89914, fail: 1186, skip: 13585, xfail: 1143
>
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed
> * arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
> * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed
> * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed
> * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed
> * riscv: 28 total, 24 passed, 4 failed
> * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed
> * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
> * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
> * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
<snip>
No Tested-by: line?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-25 16:33 [PATCH 5.16 0000/1033] 5.16.3-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-25 23:39 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-26 2:26 ` Justin Forbes
2022-01-26 3:41 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-01-26 14:09 ` Ron Economos
2022-01-26 15:59 ` Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
2022-01-26 17:21 ` Fox Chen
2022-01-26 18:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-26 18:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-26 18:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-26 21:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-27 8:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-26 22:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-27 5:00 ` Scott Bruce
2022-01-27 5:11 ` Daniel Díaz
2022-01-27 6:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-01-27 11:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-01-26 12:17 Ronald Warsow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfI4oDEY7W4lxWZP@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).