From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE30C433EF for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349121AbiA1OYU (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:24:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349109AbiA1OYS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:24:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB89C061714; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:24:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id k6-20020a05600c1c8600b003524656034cso1125162wms.2; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:24:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=maJHvbktVEBb7xJacQ1lqleTWcxE1EbrXGVkYr99UvM=; b=T5z4S/MCNI/qviacNFzJPaSK74K0DxoVrVdy2ybpvJ6W2vghC1XZlOwoaGifgfTu9w 2FuwJguzNfcC8VYLSEki2EB6L7T/Uzayljsm717N85LH6jeW7iYtUAWzq5sAiHkMMP+2 XYowlKgw2qrjNuswkyXPCWMZ28BpK7Nt5RIKFbu0N5AyEb8nrcfsZXKQ3AsqFVJ8V8rR Na6em4lGwseYLwhJmKsmN2c5miVCFK9nLoyf5GvN46i64kG6CKPbsBDUBofFYbOP5ab6 FH9Tv3WRg8s52I4urjAXMavaq1RO8FERxtB1+EmOmcrwkAfhT4cKswVqySFoOZYCW3Aq +P8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=maJHvbktVEBb7xJacQ1lqleTWcxE1EbrXGVkYr99UvM=; b=MQB2ZP1RSyhQDsPVFu+YTH19OayhoIniKcMko40+nyaYIhQkORQJZ1DylywfTsqV7k 5Q+Z8Rwa6FKdJ1MelAwhPQalDsoDupUAqKzkKING6decRlwsG5QKcb7wanNw3PLhwyEr ZUWYyLtq3KujEK//gbjwCd5SI01bx+jehA51WUoHk0OxLJ205N+44Rf3TMPKQ8ixeNtV HS3yjbahZHC54JzngkqRafxzP2UEflZAcJ3Dw/W/SntT3e2KnRIN7XTvyJAc5ac0nn50 NcFRi3LC4V7s7O5EkhEy2Yu5VeIgkrmhx5zapXg3R+s8Bf3aqvVadgojLrIShGh/ZMaw 9lZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rUWFJxCbeRPkgib+clEklxfstOXXhn2XhQsS3b5BQpYatiKG9 RpugiFHlbxmIxaB8ohSuF2dc+er0m94= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrAAweglttUU3cVtQ742y5T+pFHDzH12KsHeRL2SE97ADX5uXzOwH4lKCMElpjyGqlXqMX4A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9ad0:: with SMTP id c199mr16179664wme.156.1643379857129; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:24:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t4sm4860844wro.71.2022.01.28.06.24.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:24:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:24:14 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220127180258.362000607@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220127180258.362000607@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/665 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip