From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if PAE roots linger after kvm_mmu_unload
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:14:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg/UCQggoKQ27pVm@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217210340.312449-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 296f8723f9ae..a67071ac80f3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5086,12 +5086,21 @@ int kvm_mmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return r;
> }
>
> +static void __kvm_mmu_unload(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + kvm_mmu_free_roots(vcpu, mmu, KVM_MMU_ROOTS_ALL);
> + WARN_ON(VALID_PAGE(mmu->root_hpa));
> + if (mmu->pae_root) {
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
> + WARN_ON(IS_VALID_PAE_ROOT(mmu->pae_root[i]));
> + }
> +}
> +
> void kvm_mmu_unload(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - kvm_mmu_free_roots(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.root_mmu, KVM_MMU_ROOTS_ALL);
> - WARN_ON(VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.root_mmu.root_hpa));
> - kvm_mmu_free_roots(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu, KVM_MMU_ROOTS_ALL);
> - WARN_ON(VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.guest_mmu.root_hpa));
> + __kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.root_mmu);
> + __kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu);
Can we just drop this one? Checkpatch doesn't like it, and IMO the existing asserts
are unnecessary. IIRC you said this one never actually fired?
WARNING: Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#22: FILE: arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:5092:
+ int i;
+ kvm_mmu_free_roots(vcpu, mmu, KVM_MMU_ROOTS_ALL);
> }
>
> static bool need_remote_flush(u64 old, u64 new)
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 21:03 [PATCH v2 00/18] KVM: MMU: do not unload MMU roots on all role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] KVM: x86: host-initiated EFER.LME write affects the MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 13:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] KVM: x86: do not deliver asynchronous page faults if CR0.PG=0 Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 14:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if PAE roots linger after kvm_mmu_unload Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:14 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-02-18 17:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 14:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid NULL-pointer dereference on page freeing bugs Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 14:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] KVM: x86/mmu: use struct kvm_mmu_root_info for mmu->root Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 14:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-23 15:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] KVM: x86/mmu: do not consult levels when freeing roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 14:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not use guest root level in audit Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 18:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 15:02 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] KVM: x86/mmu: do not pass vcpu to root freeing functions Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 15:16 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-23 15:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] KVM: x86/mmu: look for a cached PGD when going from 32-bit to 64-bit Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:01 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] KVM: x86/mmu: load new PGD after the shadow MMU is initialized Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Always use current mmu's role when loading new PGD Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:23 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] KVM: x86/mmu: clear MMIO cache when unloading the MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:32 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] KVM: x86: reset and reinitialize the MMU in __set_sregs_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-19 0:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:48 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 20:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-19 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-24 11:02 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-24 15:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 15:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] KVM: x86/mmu: rename kvm_mmu_new_pgd, introduce variant that calls get_guest_pgd Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 9:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 21:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 15:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 17:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_REQ_MMU_UPDATE_ROOT Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 21:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-19 7:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-22 16:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 15:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] KVM: x86: flush TLB separately from MMU reset Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 15:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-24 16:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] KVM: x86: do not unload MMU roots on all role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-24 16:25 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yg/UCQggoKQ27pVm@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).