linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:10:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgSQKvv7rL6MFPRr@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210031053.5352-1-yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:10:53PM +0900, Rei Yamamoto wrote:
> If cpus on a node are offline at boot time, there are
> difference in the number of nodes between when building affinity
> masks for present cpus and when building affinity masks for possible
> cpus. This patch fixes a problem caused by the difference of the
> number of nodes:
> 
>  - The routine of "numvecs <= nodes" condition can overwrite bits of
>    masks for present cpus in building masks for possible cpus. Fix this
>    problem by making CPU bits, which is not target, not changing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/affinity.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index f7ff8919dc9b..d2d01565d2ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -269,8 +269,9 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
>  	 */
>  	if (numvecs <= nodes) {
>  		for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
> +			cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
>  			cpumask_or(&masks[curvec].mask, &masks[curvec].mask,
> -				   node_to_cpumask[n]);
> +				   nmsk);
>  			if (++curvec == last_affv)
>  				curvec = firstvec;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

-- 
Ming


       reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220210031053.5352-1-yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
2022-02-10  4:10 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-03-30  4:42   ` [PATCH v3] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced Rei Yamamoto
2022-03-30 23:09     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-31  0:24       ` Rei Yamamoto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgSQKvv7rL6MFPRr@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).