From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6A8C4332F for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348696AbiBNNzR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:55:17 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:35220 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242299AbiBNNzO (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:55:14 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4D065A2; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 05:55:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644846906; x=1676382906; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=yguvRxMRnV5IB+hh/M/twMshNoTTuG75v2iSOANJTMY=; b=Zqa4zMHVJSnp5exm5GP2FAV9TXs8EHVaGnzNEJYK+D14WfgWNaD39JHY s6W8tnZwxdEfgxF8cqpJWNWgGC2C8pBjnrWKgsSV3nRJECpeaq4M4UpWA TI+e6X0GOX2oLWWDt37zi5TlyDUDkHgpqJHFDYVLW8EXiZ1SrqJ8CgKVo NhosWtR7D5R8tFKTKIzInFT8hkpy0X4rwFpS52Xsa5cKT4UQakpMb8D3F Q4mrhc4cDHk5xUEGhjmM6mCQM23HIlLvmXNdL8x5jLPd7j77Qn29ynQiX wKRgf0kf6ZxR7pHhyzRaEBojONtLptMYathi4vowR5Byz8WBTG371MWVn A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10257"; a="247686644" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,368,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="247686644" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2022 05:55:06 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,368,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="587214685" Received: from unknown (HELO smile.fi.intel.com) ([10.237.72.59]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2022 05:55:03 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nJbnr-004YcY-FU; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:54:07 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:54:07 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , rust-for-linux , linux-kernel , Gary Guo , Alex Gaynor , Wedson Almeida Filho , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/20] vsprintf: add new `%pA` format specifier Message-ID: References: <20220212130410.6901-1-ojeda@kernel.org> <20220212130410.6901-13-ojeda@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 01:27:48PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:19 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > Not sure I understand this... > > > > ...together with this in the current SoB chain. > > From my reading of `Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst`, > this is the case I have to use: > > ``` > Example of a patch submitted by a Co-developed-by: author:: > > From: From Author > > > > Co-developed-by: Random Co-Author > Signed-off-by: Random Co-Author > Signed-off-by: From Author > Co-developed-by: Submitting Co-Author > Signed-off-by: Submitting Co-Author > ``` > > Do you think another case applies? I see, thanks for elaboration! ... > > I'm wondering if you considered to use %pV. > > Please see Rasmus' reply, i.e. we are using Rust's own formatting > machinery (the compiler validates the format string and creates an > object that represents the formatting to be done). Yes, I read that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko