From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAB9C433EF for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241540AbiBWOZD (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:25:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232221AbiBWOZB (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:25:01 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1ABB1A98; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:24:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1645626274; x=1677162274; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=IV+wRjFZ0KIXQehwCsMDvsyLOE60ai+2jVh9pnpXlHw=; b=hwGB37uAAbJMo7lqmR1cNDNigoiICmbnIubWQ/wBTB1D3oV9AqGoc0Vt /MkQCHq8oT3FFm4jZE+hL6y98BzpAMshpedv2Kp/7wyd1vwuK5CEnkGEB BO4dTcyrLLugu5cgVxloULR/cyOoSyoxYPbXqVvJBlIhb0a3V7WTHIj8U gGPf0/ihmVOiT0oWI5asD0mce+uZ302BfAXbmQ8f+szDxrC5ZyzNs8g3Z +LupkrpZlfnOF4QVi+tOy6R9YuH3gamNYjcYoZ/1CgIf5E/V4tXll2k7Y 6aidZxFW9D9kvgWMtzn+0FNLlvkVV3sYZk5aClVT03phTLFtYdottTH4Z Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10266"; a="232594619" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,391,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="232594619" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2022 06:24:34 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,391,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="508452930" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.59]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2022 06:24:32 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nMsYP-007SIC-D9; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:23:41 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:23:40 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bjorn Helgaas , Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: 8250_lpss: Switch to pcim_iomap() instead of pci_ioremap_bar() Message-ID: References: <20220215134359.78169-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20220215134359.78169-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 04:20:16AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 01:37:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Okay, so if I read this thread correctly Christoph suggests to introduce > > pcim_ioremap_bar() and then use it. Am I right? > > Yes. Thanks for clarification! > > Christoph, since we are on the topic about pcim_*() APIs, can you chime in > > the discussion [1] about IRQ vectors allocation? > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210607153916.1021016-1-zhengdejin5@gmail.com/ > > Did you intend to link to a 8 month old series or is there something > else this should point to? Yes, because it seems stalled. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko