From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>,
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 17:23:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhkCbws+csQyIDKQ@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-hwJJpJf-GHzU7-9bhMz7OydNPCucTtrm=-GeOf-Ee5-aKrw@mail.gmail.com>
HID selftests question for now:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 05:00:53PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > I am not entirely clear on which plan I want to have for userspace.
> > > I'd like to have libinput on board, but right now, Peter's stance is
> > > "not in my garden" (and he has good reasons for it).
> > > So my initial plan is to cook and hold the bpf programs in hid-tools,
> > > which is the repo I am using for the regression tests on HID.
> >
> > Why isn't the hid regression tests in the kernel tree also? That would
> > allow all of the testers out there to test things much easier than
> > having to suck down another test repo (like Linaro and 0-day and
> > kernelci would be forced to do).
>
> 2 years ago I would have argued that the ease of development of
> gitlab.fd.o was more suited to a fast moving project.
>
> Now... The changes in the core part of the code don't change much so
> yes, merging it in the kernel might have a lot of benefits outside of
> what you said. The most immediate one is that I could require fixes to
> be provided with a test, and merge them together, without having to
> hold them until Linus releases a new version.
Yes, having a test be required for a fix is a great idea. Many
subsystems do this already and it helps a lot.
> If nobody complains of having the regression tests in python with
> pytest and some Python 3.6+ features, that is definitely something I
> should look for.
Look at the tools/testing/selftests/ directory today. We already have
python3 tests in there, and as long as you follow the proper TAP output
format, all should be fine. The tc-testing python code in the kernel
trees seems to do that and no one has complained yet :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-25 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-24 11:08 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] HID: initial BPF implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:34 ` Greg KH
2022-02-24 13:52 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-28 17:30 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-26 7:19 ` Song Liu
2022-02-28 17:38 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/6] HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptor from an eBPF program Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-26 7:25 ` Song Liu
2022-02-28 17:41 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/6] HID: bpf: add hid_{get|set}_data helpers Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] HID: bpf: add new BPF type to trigger commands from userspace Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] HID: bpf: tests: rely on uhid event to know if a test device is ready Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] HID: bpf: add bpf_hid_raw_request helper function Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 11:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Greg KH
2022-02-24 13:49 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-24 17:20 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-25 16:06 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-25 16:19 ` Greg KH
2022-02-25 16:30 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-25 13:38 ` Greg KH
2022-02-25 16:00 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-25 16:23 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-02-25 16:32 ` Greg KH
2022-02-26 7:36 ` Song Liu
2022-02-26 9:19 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-02-28 16:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2022-02-24 17:41 ` Bastien Nocera
2022-02-24 18:20 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YhkCbws+csQyIDKQ@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.hutterer@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).