From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B6FC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233048AbiDFMYW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:24:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55182 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233861AbiDFMXB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:23:01 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 519705415F6; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 01:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F8F60B19; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D4E9C385A1; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:11:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1649232692; bh=d9mabnz2/PxBWR5XbqNSwFGWUc5kISZ3RG1iYADeuW8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tkERSaWwH2WsExaNM9z3Z+vHFCSkxIF2hpS5qVqLc58xEfB0YxxsFpR5YiHPwkDfG DtWdUvuc9U59wRypRl5pAd59q9f7izG7PrdlFAaIjexHopaQh9zQfc1oWf/oBzZM6m HSJjw8Zch7RvDenKLE+1KioU5WZ0kfvRkVvUHIno= Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:11:29 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com, Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/599] 5.10.110-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220405070258.802373272@linuxfoundation.org> <20220406010749.GA1133386@roeck-us.net> <20220406023025.GA1926389@roeck-us.net> <20220405225212.061852f9@gandalf.local.home> <20220405230812.2feca4ed@gandalf.local.home> <20220405232413.6b38e966@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220405232413.6b38e966@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:24:13PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 23:08:12 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Here's a thought, if you decide to backport a patch to stable, and you see > > that there's another commit with a "Fixes" tag to the automatically > > selected commit. DO NOT BACKPORT IF THE FIXES PATCH FAILS TO GO BACK TOO! > > Seriously. This should be the case for *all* backported patches, not just > the AUTOSEL ones. > > Otherwise you are backporting a commit to "stable" that is KNOWN TO BE > BROKEN! My scripts usually do catch this, let me go see what went wrong...