From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342EBC433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234303AbiDFOMa (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:12:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59596 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234447AbiDFOMS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:12:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428CD12F6C2; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 03:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id p189so1117736wmp.3; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 03:06:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=47pi7dvQzwfLX3ainw4cotVpAlhqEnPPur28m2DBYnI=; b=oyRzTjU9Y5vVWWhJlEXWBmqOttlu6Wt5erI3pvi3Fx5Be/D9iwtxpOKRdMqP8MSnvV JBJGNCltub8U7JXIZ9M5AUptIBltfbxi4nu/ZZCi8tXkbjKvPp+Epc3VQSPe52ylIXpy ubB2jEtugsabOsmsf+PzZzpWaaV/LpZUIhPFv72C1ChcXPk/o3VCBcXs7tjofJaVJpqA yC3Gaaecl3i9SCS0y10GBJEn1wndI7ziUMRs9XbXmODOmMaV4YAdNfaPbtVNPnY7mDVq xpvGUcS/BLncMrjceqSCIxgkHqp31zclZ1gtlHQTFDVsVq+1Lql1hC9hId/rA59BKViW fJuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=47pi7dvQzwfLX3ainw4cotVpAlhqEnPPur28m2DBYnI=; b=li/3TbjpWZHsrO+pbFpJmtXrij9rHnpV7KRyXW2Lz7jkUCar7FcAjsIc6tceNQsPN5 7TweOfbz2md+g3nTgA2JCOApSHNWfCYhQjcpw7h3/WG+/dFM8wCqBq1j0/Bfcf65mUx7 ssqDT066TvXeTQbgs7946m2i4ZTPiv9RFCamQn+TT8v17B5SHgeQ5MDwNy9QN4PkDyhK EBV56EDNXSFbfHAwdgDJDcr51Of2fpycaevFq1CwNxQG3nZZlt+q6ps8zkocuT1ENZQ3 GvH7VbkgbbzdXk34swUil93BLj52npvhWg1HnINcoGFN7p+h0SxWssS/Aa8WbdB+C3Lm ZsOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327sjlCJ7E4ykCI0sLo8UfCfU7Hz54jC2GxxmXWSPiEhO/NEJRx i2za2kx6msNbxP4PxR9Z3Dc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjEWxUDNSk8rXkcq9W0u0al0JkpQ7wIp2FGwbqxDUXcBGMVgOqvVjB2N3EDRLNfNHBWOY8ag== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f10:b0:38c:ae36:d305 with SMTP id l16-20020a05600c4f1000b0038cae36d305mr6818888wmq.34.1649239589575; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 03:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l2-20020a5d5602000000b00206120e0b0fsm10793032wrv.18.2022.04.06.03.06.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 03:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:06:27 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/599] 5.10.110-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220405070258.802373272@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220405070258.802373272@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:24:54AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.110 release. > There are 599 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Apr 2022 07:01:33 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: fails to boot on my test laptop. Detailed report at: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/Yky7RmYZnPp9HgzT@debian/ x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/978 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/981 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip