From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2648C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236433AbiDFPrS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:47:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58228 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236329AbiDFPqu (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:46:50 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD9D219AE3 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649250207; x=1680786207; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=iTWnY1k7bbh1/b+9WL07ilkWgLIQ46sXRa4zPnKXvHw=; b=Q4HDE74FLPEMHJsE9HCcJeZPC/rXNtJ5lW4jq1KQr1lC5VmZm5S4s4EO mmmDKHoQI8yjJpTQ6AwNPtmccIZZW3zfdmNP91n/s5EztxK7jS2hHDAKo ly0z6nSMf85y1koEdO40DeXVZDT5k8ses2aviXlZpUeoO2N9hLFoR6F8c BzttIlSYd1/0LVMIZ2clx/QKbybxmQbAROzjvolly1MFIij1PQx6W0Nos ol2uiAjNFrM1evnJwzMQgUo22erg2UjStZv60501TV47VZMY98jM7umNZ tHlpvAPe0gnA11SI5MaJBahwUZsiG/4MXQANcrw9/rjZcPPE5qsPwMMa3 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10308"; a="324206892" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,239,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="324206892" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2022 06:03:17 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,239,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="588361010" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2022 06:03:13 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nc5I5-000EGZ-94; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:01:41 +0300 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:01:41 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Detlev Casanova , Mark Brown , Dave Stevenson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] regulator/rpi-panel-attiny: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment Message-ID: References: <20220325184508.45670-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220325184508.45670-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:45:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of > the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual > drivers. Remove these assignment all at once. > > For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation. Any comments on this? Can it be applied now? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko