From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] iommu: Remove unused argument in is_attach_deferred
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:19:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkSRKZcJO0q3v5WL@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330142340.GA2111031@nvidia.com>
* Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> [220330 14:21]:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 05:00:39PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> [700101 02:00]:
> > > The is_attach_deferred iommu_ops callback is a device op. The domain
> > > argument is unnecessary and never used. Remove it to make code clean.
> >
> > Looks like this causes a regression for at least drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c.
> >
> > To me it seems the issue is there is no is_attach_deferred implemented, so
> > we get a NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008:
> >
> > __iommu_probe_device from probe_iommu_group+0x2c/0x38
> > probe_iommu_group from bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xbc
> > bus_for_each_dev from bus_iommu_probe+0x34/0x2e8
> > bus_iommu_probe from bus_set_iommu+0x80/0xc8
> > bus_set_iommu from omap_iommu_init+0x88/0xcc
> > omap_iommu_init from do_one_initcall+0x44/0x24c
> >
> > Any ideas for a fix?
> >
> > It would be good to fix this quickly so we don't end up with a broken
> > v5.18-rc1..
> >
> > For reference, this is mainline commit 41bb23e70b50 ("iommu: Remove unused
> > argument in is_attach_deferred").
>
> Are you confident in the bisection? I don't see how that commit could
> NULL deref..
Oops sorry you're right, the breaking commit is a different patch, it's
3f6634d997db ("iommu: Use right way to retrieve iommu_ops") instead. I must
have picked the wrong commit while testing.
> Can you find the code that is the NULL deref?
I can debug a bit more tomorrow.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-30 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-16 2:52 [PATCH v4 0/9] iommu cleanup and refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove guest pasid related callbacks Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] iommu: Remove guest pasid related interfaces and definitions Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove aux-domain related callbacks Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] iommu: Remove aux-domain related interfaces and iommu_ops Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iommu: Remove apply_resv_region Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/nouveau/device: Get right pgsize_bitmap of iommu_domain Lu Baolu
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iommu: Use right way to retrieve iommu_ops Lu Baolu
2022-05-04 7:53 ` [bug] NULL pointer deref after 3f6634d997db ("iommu: Use right way to retrieve iommu_ops") Jan Stancek
2022-05-04 11:14 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-04 11:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-04 12:08 ` Jan Stancek
2022-05-04 12:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] iommu: Remove unused argument in is_attach_deferred Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 14:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-03-30 14:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 17:19 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2022-03-30 17:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-31 6:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-03-31 6:40 ` Drew Fustini
2022-02-16 2:52 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iommu: Split struct iommu_ops Lu Baolu
2022-02-28 12:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] iommu cleanup and refactoring Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkSRKZcJO0q3v5WL@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).