From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@antgroup.com>,
John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:56:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlOY6jGpl2EBs6zE@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a0bb9a9-c2a1-2e3a-8f23-16109ae1e525@huawei.com>
On 04/08/22 at 05:47pm, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/4/8 17:32, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi, Lei
> >
> > On 02/27/22 at 11:07am, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> Changes since [v20]:
> >> 1. Check whether crashkernel=Y,low is incorrectly configured or not configured. Do different processing.
> >> 2. Share the existing description of x86. The configuration of arm64 is the same as that of x86.
> >> 3. Define the value of macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX as memblock.current_limit, instead of MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE.
> >> 4. To improve readability, some lightweight code adjustments have been made to reserve_craskernel(), including comments.
> >> 5. The defined value of DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE reconsiders swiotlb, just like x86, to share documents.
> >
> > 5.18 rc1 is already done, do you have plan to post a new version for
> > reviewing?
>
> Yes, v5.18-rc1 has added a new patch
> commit 031495635b46 ("arm64: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() for platforms with no DMA memory zones")
> to allow block mapping again, so my patches need to be modified. It should be post next week.
Sounds great, thanks. Just a reminder, please take your time.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-27 3:07 [PATCH v21 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Zhen Lei
2022-02-27 3:07 ` [PATCH v21 1/5] kdump: return -ENOENT if required cmdline option does not exist Zhen Lei
2022-03-15 11:57 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-15 12:21 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-15 13:32 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-03-16 5:17 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-16 5:39 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-16 6:15 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-02-27 3:07 ` [PATCH v21 2/5] arm64: Use insert_resource() to simplify code Zhen Lei
2022-02-27 3:07 ` [PATCH v21 3/5] arm64: kdump: reimplement crashkernel=X Zhen Lei
2022-03-16 12:11 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-16 13:11 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-03-17 2:36 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-17 3:19 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-03-17 3:47 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-17 7:30 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-03-17 2:38 ` Baoquan He
2022-03-17 3:23 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-03-21 13:29 ` John Donnelly
2022-03-21 14:09 ` Dave Kleikamp
2022-03-22 1:58 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-02-27 3:07 ` [PATCH v21 4/5] of: fdt: Add memory for devices by DT property "linux,usable-memory-range" Zhen Lei
2022-02-27 3:07 ` [PATCH v21 5/5] docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for arm64 Zhen Lei
2022-03-15 11:59 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-08 9:32 ` [PATCH v21 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Baoquan He
2022-04-08 9:47 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-04-11 2:56 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlOY6jGpl2EBs6zE@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=John.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dingguo.cz@antgroup.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).