linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	chris.redpath@arm.com, qperret@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 21:56:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqSe/7KKplsAUI7C@geo.homenetwork> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607123254.565579-3-vdonnefort@google.com>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:49PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:

> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> 
> Before being migrated to a new CPU, a task sees its PELT values
> synchronized with rq last_update_time. Once done, that same task will also
> have its sched_avg last_update_time reset. This means the time between
> the migration and the last clock update will not be accounted for in
> util_avg and a discontinuity will appear. This issue is amplified by the
> PELT clock scaling. It takes currently one tick after the CPU being idle
> to let clock_pelt catching up clock_task.
> 
> This is especially problematic for asymmetric CPU capacity systems which
> need stable util_avg signals for task placement and energy estimation.
> 
> Ideally, this problem would be solved by updating the runqueue clocks
> before the migration. But that would require taking the runqueue lock
> which is quite expensive [1]. Instead estimate the missing time and update
> the task util_avg with that value.
> 
> To that end, we need sched_clock_cpu() but it is a costly function. Limit
> the usage to the case where the source CPU is idle as we know this is when
> the clock is having the biggest risk of being outdated. In this such case,
> let's call it cfs_idle_lag the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value
> at rq idle and cfs_rq idle. And rq_idle_lag the delta between "now" and
> the rq_clock_pelt at rq idle.
> 
> The estimated PELT clock is then:
> 
>    last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
>    + cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
>    + rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> 
>   last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
>                    = rq_clock_pelt() - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time
> 
>   cfs_idle_lag = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle -
>                  rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> 
>   rq_idle_lag = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The rq_clock_pelt() from last_update_time being the same as
> rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle, we can write:
> 
>   estimation = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
>                sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The clocks being not accessible without the rq lock taken, some timestamps
> are created:
> 
>       rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
>       rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->enter_idle
>       cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time is cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> 
> The rq_idle_lag part of the missing time is however an estimation that
> doesn't take into account IRQ and Paravirt time.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709115759.10451-1-chris.redpath@arm.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 05614d9b919c..77f3eb1bf624 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3310,6 +3310,29 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static inline bool load_avg_is_decayed(struct sched_avg *sa)
> +{
> +	if (sa->load_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (sa->util_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (sa->runnable_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
> +	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
> +	 * break this.
> +	 */
> +	SCHED_WARN_ON(sa->load_avg ||
> +		      sa->util_avg ||
> +		      sa->runnable_avg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> @@ -3347,27 +3370,12 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	if (cfs_rq->load.weight)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.load_sum)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.util_sum)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.runnable_sum)
> +	if (!load_avg_is_decayed(&cfs_rq->avg))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
> -	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
> -	 * break this.
> -	 */
> -	SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg ||
> -		      cfs_rq->avg.util_avg ||
> -		      cfs_rq->avg.runnable_avg);
> -
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3706,6 +3714,89 @@ static inline void add_tg_cfs_propagate(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long runnable_sum
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> +static inline void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> +	u64 throttled = 0, now, lut;
> +	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> +	struct rq *rq;
> +	bool is_idle;
> +
> +	if (load_avg_is_decayed(&se->avg))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +	rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	is_idle = is_idle_task(rcu_dereference(rq->curr));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The lag estimation comes with a cost we don't want to pay all the
> +	 * time. Hence, limiting to the case where the source CPU is idle and
> +	 * we know we are at the greatest risk to have an outdated clock.
> +	 */
> +	if (!is_idle)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Estimated "now" is: last_update_time + cfs_idle_lag + rq_idle_lag, where:
> +	 *
> +	 *   last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
> +	 *	= cfs_rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *        - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> +	 *      = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 * We can then write:
> +	 *
> +	 *    now = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
> +	 *          sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 * Where:
> +	 *      rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
> +	 *      rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->clock_idle
> +	 *      cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle is
> +	 *      cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> +	 */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	throttled = u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle);
> +	/* The clock has been stopped for throttling */
> +	if (throttled == U64_MAX)
> +		return;
> +#endif
> +	now = u64_u32_load(rq->clock_pelt_idle);
> +	/*
> +	 * Paired with _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(). It ensures at the worst case
> +	 * is observed the old clock_pelt_idle value and the new clock_idle,
> +	 * which lead to an underestimation. The opposite would lead to an
> +	 * overestimation.
> +	 */

The sentence of 'The opposite would lead to an overestimation' means that
clock_pelt_idle is new clock_idle is old if I am not wrong. If clock_pelt_idle
is new then clock_idle is new too. The later is the updated state of both, IMHO
 this sentence does not stand.

> +	smp_rmb();
> +	lut = cfs_rq_last_update_time(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	now -= throttled;
> +	if (now < lut)
> +		/*
> +		 * cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time is more recent than our
> +		 * estimation, let's use it.
> +		 */
> +		now = lut;
> +	else
> +		now += sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - u64_u32_load(rq->clock_idle);
> +
> +	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(now, se);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se) {}
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * update_cfs_rq_load_avg - update the cfs_rq's load/util averages
>   * @now: current time, as per cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
> @@ -4437,6 +4528,9 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  	 */
>  	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
>  		update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
> +		update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -6911,6 +7005,8 @@ static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
>   */
>  static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  {
> +	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * As blocked tasks retain absolute vruntime the migration needs to
>  	 * deal with this by subtracting the old and adding the new
> @@ -6918,7 +7014,6 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  	 * the task on the new runqueue.
>  	 */
>  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
> -		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>  
>  		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
> @@ -6930,25 +7025,29 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  		 * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
>  		 */
>  		lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
> -		detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
> +		detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>  
>  	} else {
> +		remove_entity_load_avg(se);
> +
>  		/*
> -		 * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
> -		 * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
> -		 * have difficulty in getting what current time is, so simply
> -		 * throw away the out-of-date time. This will result in the
> -		 * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
> -		 * sounds not bad.
> +		 * Here, the task's PELT values have been updated according to
> +		 * the current rq's clock. But if that clock hasn't been
> +		 * updated in a while, a substantial idle time will be missed,
> +		 * leading to an inflation after wake-up on the new rq.
> +		 *
> +		 * Estimate the missing time from the cfs_rq last_update_time
> +		 * and update sched_avg to improve the PELT continuity after
> +		 * migration.
>  		 */
> -		remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> +		migrate_se_pelt_lag(se);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Tell new CPU we are migrated */
> -	p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
> +	se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
>  
>  	/* We have migrated, no longer consider this task hot */
> -	p->se.exec_start = 0;
> +	se->exec_start = 0;
>  
>  	update_scan_period(p, new_cpu);
>  }
> @@ -8114,6 +8213,9 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
>  		if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) {
>  			update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
>  
> +			if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
> +				update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
> +
>  			if (cfs_rq == &rq->cfs)
>  				decayed = true;
>  		}
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.h b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> index 4ff2ed4f8fa1..3a0e0dc28721 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,25 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
>  	WRITE_ONCE(avg->util_est.enqueued, enqueued);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +	assert_clock_updated(rq);
> +
> +	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
> +}
> +
> +/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
> +static inline void _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
> +
> +	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_idle, rq_clock(rq));
> +	/* Paired with smp_rmb in migrate_se_pelt_lag() */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_pelt_idle, rq_clock_pelt(rq));
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The clock_pelt scales the time to reflect the effective amount of
>   * computation done during the running delta time but then sync back to
> @@ -76,8 +95,7 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
>  static inline void update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(is_idle_task(rq->curr))) {
> -		/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
> -		rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
> +		_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -130,17 +148,23 @@ static inline void update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
>  	 */
>  	if (util_sum >= divider)
>  		rq->lost_idle_time += rq_clock_task(rq) - rq->clock_pelt;
> +
> +	_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> -	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> -	assert_clock_updated(rq);
> +	u64 throttled;
>  
> -	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
> +	if (unlikely(cfs_rq->throttle_count))
> +		throttled = U64_MAX;
> +	else
> +		throttled = cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
> +
> +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle, throttled);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
>  /* rq->task_clock normalized against any time this cfs_rq has spent throttled */
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> @@ -150,6 +174,7 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
>  }
>  #else
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq));
> @@ -204,6 +229,7 @@ update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta) { }
>  static inline void
>  update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq) { }
>  
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
>  #endif
>  
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index bf4a0ec98678..de5c99bea7be 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -648,6 +648,10 @@ struct cfs_rq {
>  	int			runtime_enabled;
>  	s64			runtime_remaining;
>  
> +	u64			throttled_pelt_idle;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	u64                     throttled_pelt_idle_copy;
> +#endif
>  	u64			throttled_clock;
>  	u64			throttled_clock_pelt;
>  	u64			throttled_clock_pelt_time;
> @@ -1020,6 +1024,12 @@ struct rq {
>  	u64			clock_task ____cacheline_aligned;
>  	u64			clock_pelt;
>  	unsigned long		lost_idle_time;
> +	u64			clock_pelt_idle;
> +	u64			clock_idle;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	u64			clock_pelt_idle_copy;
> +	u64			clock_idle_copy;
> +#endif
>  
>  	atomic_t		nr_iowait;
>  
> -- 
> 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-11 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-09 15:23   ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-14 11:45     ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-14 14:28       ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-21  8:32         ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-08  9:53   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-11 13:56   ` Tao Zhou [this message]
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin " Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Lukasz Luba
2022-06-14 11:47   ` Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqSe/7KKplsAUI7C@geo.homenetwork \
    --to=tao.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).