From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7BDC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235075AbiGGL6x (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2022 07:58:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235750AbiGGL50 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2022 07:57:26 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D595A2DD; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 04:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 775E9B8213C; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BD74C3411E; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:55:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657194933; bh=IQJDPVLJ4H47AUx8Ljjae/JPRhou/gHAHrF0+znEb8E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D+rdZAHylfBWCoO2RrECPmnBMH0cZjere+QAfwBFw8GFnHbrSoQT9D9ZlBfqxyrTb PDPXgBP0RriwGv9jRQO5zvcI02Yi0lTaKT5WCoAYUQJxOartyudNb39sMYX2mruqXI NaE/l4mBa7S4H9cttaqmX+ineSZwlndYxZy8NiB/n81J3M43BsENl5bQCzH+nwnb4s KYOGHyr0j2yDziaK8UDrBzUkQZv5dAfVOS+R+GsHxBSXRZUpcQaANgM2JhJb85Tplr zi1lcv+vf15CVi5jAQB4RztIlt1oyAu9AwvDwJw2rWvbZIW+2I95qN5h0piVa9qmdl 4DYwd0CMJqueg== Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:55:28 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Mukunda,Vijendar" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Liam Girdwood , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree Message-ID: References: <20220707200428.3eb1a20e@canb.auug.org.au> <872891aa-11ea-ed60-5090-940e8e7e4458@amd.com> <9f4d8898-eb5f-aa91-57d3-66a78e9c4316@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NixQ1HU3mERZ+lRc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f4d8898-eb5f-aa91-57d3-66a78e9c4316@amd.com> X-Cookie: Tell me what to think!!! Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --NixQ1HU3mERZ+lRc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 05:12:31PM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote: > If we have to submit the patch freshly then earlier patch should be > reverted in for-next branch. > Should we resend the fix again or else should we submit patch freshly? If you have already sent a fix there's no need to resend. --NixQ1HU3mERZ+lRc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmLGybAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AFMQf+KDF7TnuBRZxBUkRorxs4XsvW9Yli+TPSF+Ak1MOL1pC/Dw83uEygrEeM iVGuhmJ/xhnrsi9oUdKhHHZmKnqzY1jt8rWKFgwiJ9VAOuPw90WwBJkBb+d7rJmT bFCSK2kzg3fsEWapNjZnEe8kcJh4Qc1M5yMkWdjHLgyRhZia9415z07nP/+mYmyp ls9Sbc3fQKR5SQ2VNMCl7RzmyDKFN9W3umOUiOkDtceM+SinUP9HfogEKZMTaVyf 7GEwdStTkNW23kZ3aG7MfBdlc5GeJ4jauoJjtrKDNBizzp5Rf+FMMIEVAFFqH2GW Z8m29KJ4J/r8HWTwX42V4ggsT6eqPg== =Hhnj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NixQ1HU3mERZ+lRc--