linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH -next,v5] nvmem: core: Fix memleak in nvmem_register()
@ 2022-07-18 12:39 Gaosheng Cui
  2022-07-18 14:21 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gaosheng Cui @ 2022-07-18 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cuigaosheng1, srinivas.kandagatla, gregkh
  Cc: linux-kernel, gongruiqi1, wangweiyang2

dev_set_name will alloc memory for nvmem->dev.kobj.name in
nvmem_register, when nvmem_validate_keepouts failed, nvmem's
memory will be freed and return, but nobody will free memory
for nvmem->dev.kobj.name, there will be memleak, so moving
nvmem_validate_keepouts() after device_register() and let
the device core deal with cleaning name in error cases.

Fixes: de0534df9347 ("nvmem: core: fix error handling while validating keepout regions")
Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/nvmem/core.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 1e3c754efd0d..2164efd12ba9 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -829,21 +829,18 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
 	nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem_dev_groups;
 #endif
 
-	if (nvmem->nkeepout) {
-		rval = nvmem_validate_keepouts(nvmem);
-		if (rval) {
-			ida_free(&nvmem_ida, nvmem->id);
-			kfree(nvmem);
-			return ERR_PTR(rval);
-		}
-	}
-
 	dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
 
 	rval = device_register(&nvmem->dev);
 	if (rval)
 		goto err_put_device;
 
+	if (nvmem->nkeepout) {
+		rval = nvmem_validate_keepouts(nvmem);
+		if (rval)
+			goto err_device_del;
+	}
+
 	if (config->compat) {
 		rval = nvmem_sysfs_setup_compat(nvmem, config);
 		if (rval)
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -next,v5] nvmem: core: Fix memleak in nvmem_register()
  2022-07-18 12:39 [PATCH -next,v5] nvmem: core: Fix memleak in nvmem_register() Gaosheng Cui
@ 2022-07-18 14:21 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2022-07-18 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gaosheng Cui; +Cc: srinivas.kandagatla, linux-kernel, gongruiqi1, wangweiyang2

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:39:49PM +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> dev_set_name will alloc memory for nvmem->dev.kobj.name in
> nvmem_register, when nvmem_validate_keepouts failed, nvmem's
> memory will be freed and return, but nobody will free memory
> for nvmem->dev.kobj.name, there will be memleak, so moving
> nvmem_validate_keepouts() after device_register() and let
> the device core deal with cleaning name in error cases.
> 
> Fixes: de0534df9347 ("nvmem: core: fix error handling while validating keepout regions")
> Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvmem/core.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 1e3c754efd0d..2164efd12ba9 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -829,21 +829,18 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
>  	nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem_dev_groups;
>  #endif
>  
> -	if (nvmem->nkeepout) {
> -		rval = nvmem_validate_keepouts(nvmem);
> -		if (rval) {
> -			ida_free(&nvmem_ida, nvmem->id);
> -			kfree(nvmem);
> -			return ERR_PTR(rval);
> -		}
> -	}
> -
>  	dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
>  
>  	rval = device_register(&nvmem->dev);
>  	if (rval)
>  		goto err_put_device;
>  
> +	if (nvmem->nkeepout) {
> +		rval = nvmem_validate_keepouts(nvmem);
> +		if (rval)
> +			goto err_device_del;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (config->compat) {
>  		rval = nvmem_sysfs_setup_compat(nvmem, config);
>  		if (rval)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:


- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
  here to properly describe this.


If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-18 14:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-18 12:39 [PATCH -next,v5] nvmem: core: Fix memleak in nvmem_register() Gaosheng Cui
2022-07-18 14:21 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).