linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 08/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Allocate mmu->pae_root for PAE paging on-demand
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:07:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtdHXjFhxPXCvhf5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ytc5Zmer7sjkGAqV@google.com>

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Allocate a page to hold the four PDPTEs for PAE paging when emulating
> > +	 * 32-bit mode.  CR3 is only 32 bits even on x86_64 in this case.
> > +	 * Therefore we need to allocate the PDP table in the first 4GB of
> > +	 * memory, which happens to fit the DMA32 zone.
> > +	 */
> > +	page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_DMA32);
> 
> Leave off __GFP_ZERO, it's unnecesary in both cases, and actively misleading in
> when TDP is disabled.  KVM _must_ write the page after making it decrypted.  And
> since I can't find any code that actually does initialize "pae_root", I suspect
> this series is buggy.
> 
> But if there is a bug, it was introduced earlier in this series, either by
> 
>   KVM: X86/MMU: Add local shadow pages
> 
> or by
> 
>   KVM: X86/MMU: Activate local shadow pages and remove old logic
> 
> depending on whether you want to blame the function that is buggy, or the patch
> that uses the buggy function..
> 
> The right place to initialize the root is kvm_mmu_alloc_local_shadow_page().
> KVM sets __GFP_ZERO for mmu_shadow_page_cache, i.e. relies on new sp->spt pages
> to be zeroed prior to "allocating" from the cache.
> 
> The PAE root backing page on the other hand is allocated once and then reused
> over and over.
> 
> 	if (role.level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL &&
> 	    !WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu->arch.mmu->pae_root)) {
> 		sp->spt = vcpu->arch.mmu->pae_root;
> 		kvm_mmu_initialize_pae_root(sp->spt): <==== something like this
> 	} else {
> 		sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
> 	}

Ah, I believe this is handled for the non-SME case in mmu_free_local_root_page().
But that won't play nice with the decryption path.  And either way, the PDPDTEs
should be explicitly initialized/zeroed when the shadow page is "allocated"

> > -	for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
> > -		mmu->pae_root[i] = INVALID_PAE_ROOT;
> 
> Please remove this code in a separate patch.  I don't care if it is removed before
> or after (I'm pretty sure the existing behavior is paranoia), but I don't want
> multiple potentially-functional changes in this patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21 13:16 [PATCH V3 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Use one-off local shadow page for special roots Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Verify PDPTE for nested NPT in PAE paging mode when page fault Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 21:17   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Add using_local_root_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 21:28   ` David Matlack
2022-05-26 21:38     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 22:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Reduce a check in using_local_root_page() for common cases Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Add local shadow pages Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 21:38   ` David Matlack
2022-05-26 22:01   ` David Matlack
2022-07-20  0:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Link PAE root pagetable with its children Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 22:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Activate local shadow pages and remove old logic Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 22:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Allocate mmu->pae_root for PAE paging on-demand Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20  0:07     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Move the verifying of NPT's PDPTE in FNAME(fetch) Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove unused INVALID_PAE_ROOT and IS_VALID_PAE_ROOT Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Don't use mmu->pae_root when shadowing PAE NPT in 64-bit host Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:26   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 23:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:17 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove mmu_alloc_special_roots() Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26  8:49 ` [PATCH V3 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Use one-off local shadow page for special roots Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 20:27   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YtdHXjFhxPXCvhf5@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).