From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15873C04A68 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232452AbiG1Oe7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:34:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37478 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231707AbiG1Oej (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:34:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD756A9F8; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id w205so2077475pfc.8; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=6oZ44hEUQblGcAR6ofAUSZycDGVSclA71sZxflubxwQ=; b=NzPq7/fsX2x4s3d2ieI7jO2Lw6v2IVjFMJA9ZC81ngORkHusPSjFeMo3WVvn8ktKKD c+IrbMcN3T6BwwGpKcqFy7wYWaixRbbyiFu+hLuVVjycacqwLg2j882pgS/I3CbOryIf 6IIP3Ce2GN2yKTVweBdJoBnGl7mBHYIrT10FjcP+mgs6hpHHZa0XbYuxofCxJKVOZ4P8 HFLjp0Hue06tmjc7O0jZTwtDEFAbSIqLrBsJi/v16LArbTTpMZcZz7bD5POG0KQKVISx B1hQ0k3rcoyyQ7EKr/1VXNctfUBhFLkYVIwBNl3mnnYfGm4DJI4+cH5L2U293maYotiZ TWJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=6oZ44hEUQblGcAR6ofAUSZycDGVSclA71sZxflubxwQ=; b=r6CrVLBVjuv7XdGA61Gu3HEqtGfXDqbOnje/Fs6pPnFZx4wjlR0HuoQVOqtZHyJkhU syJT9NpwuzYdo/h+liL+BQzBce2cJOpRgvKGZAslVdFZbRrakljB7PzIHKA0PQDL6O0K HbNzHR8b/I27QJBpHSf0X5Ggi+l4QvL8lUSirPZNJE7q1jLpoNt+mcK6P27KvAlRPRut eMUdlraiClldvj29e/LuoT0MwGjgGfyf/XpIp1+1BgJ6BmAqwhm9jRcgTFLvZogmUWpQ 5ePh64ECrjhiZ+U1x2fnXT7PuO0ShuwX/O4RS9jmvhZL/kEe6drLKHRfKEtOYpkWVrn+ ngSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9LXZh0rL2mcviEHj3IySbs2Sf4xs/OoUMYMds8GapYghZ1NZRz gPxFaVu4xZNxl+qYAjNcrng= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tYMDQ1g5FXssNlVJgSsYWnrrpDhMGbKYf5Ln0V0LC9slDq0yuzPIaB+VnWlrkumYSRWNVpyw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:26f1:b0:52b:d0aa:4178 with SMTP id p49-20020a056a0026f100b0052bd0aa4178mr27348044pfw.86.1659018719861; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2402:3a80:196b:933a:553c:d695:8a60:6d86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x24-20020aa79418000000b00528c6c7bf37sm825573pfo.129.2022.07.28.07.31.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:31:52 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/62] 4.19.254-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220727161004.175638564@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220727161004.175638564@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 06:10:09PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.254 release. > There are 62 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:09:50 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220724): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1570 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip